From 11:00 PM CDT Friday, Nov 8 - 2:30 PM CDT Saturday, Nov 9, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Polar Graph cannot handle Waveforms in NXG 3.0.2

Bug got probably introduced in NXG 3.0.x, since it still worked in NXG 2.1 as long as I can remember.

See Snippet and corresponding front panel. Seems that something is going wrong with the dt value.

Waveform_polargraph.png

 

Waveform_polargraphfront.png

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 5
(2,395 Views)

Hello schoffel,

 

Thanks for pointing this out. I tried it in my side and saw the different behavior between 2.1 and 3.0.2.

 

I have filed Corrective Action Request (CAR) 736432 to address this inconsistency.

 

Thanks,

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 5
(2,364 Views)

Does wiring a waveform to a Polar Graph have some notable value for you? Would it be harmful if we disabled this capability?

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 5
(2,329 Views)

Hi, this was actually very valuable. The scenario is the following:

 

We are collecting data from a distance sensor dependent on the rotation of a shaft. The output is an array with the data for all angle values (with a varying Delta). It is therefore possible to have for example 3600 values with a delta of 0.1 degree for one rotation of the shaft. The trick was now to set dt to 0.1 to scale that data to a total distance of 360 data points (and thus one round in the polar graph).

 

Maybe it is a misuse of the polar graph but perfectly working for us.

 

Best regards,

Felix

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 5
(2,326 Views)

Sounds like enough of a reason for us to correct the issue properly. Thanks for the info!

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 5
(2,315 Views)