ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

My Scaling VI running slow

Solved!
Go to solution

@GOB34 wrote:

Would you recommend changing the method of indicators?


I have no idea what you mean by that cryptic sentence.

0 Kudos
Message 31 of 36
(308 Views)

Fair, sorry about the short wording.

 

I was responding to your question in Message 16 of 31 in this thread,

 

"I was not asking about timing, just about these indicators."

0 Kudos
Message 32 of 36
(305 Views)

Yes, I got that, but I still have no idea what "changing the method of indicators" means? Makes no sense!

0 Kudos
Message 33 of 36
(300 Views)

It seemed that you were recommending a different approach to showing these data being that they are waveforms but I am only indicating values.

0 Kudos
Message 34 of 36
(297 Views)

All your data ever display are a single scalar value (or maybe a chart?). If you would scale on these few scalar values would be significantly more efficient that processing all these waveforms, then throwing out all results except one for each waveform.

0 Kudos
Message 35 of 36
(292 Views)

Thanks for the clarification, I hear you.

 

I do use all of the waveform info in other parts of my project, so that info is not "thrown out".

 

I see what you mean, though, on doing the scaling on only the scalar data.

 

I have implemented the approach of doing the scaling on the incoming data as described above and it is working very well. I do record the scaling factors for each channel in the TDMS file so those scaled data can always be reverted to raw voltages if needed.

 

I appreciate your support and advice.

Message 36 of 36
(289 Views)