09-20-2005 04:04 PM
09-21-2005 09:16 AM
Update on this problem - it happens on multiple PCs, so I suspect a corrupted vi, but I tried to install a backup copy of the vi's from 2002 and get the same failure. This was working at one point on this station which is really puzzling. I even put LV40 on my XP based laptop (no DAQ devices), copied the files into user.lib and it crashed here as well.
I'm suspecting that I will have to put the vi's somewhere else, and the re-create all of the test executive sequences that pointed to vi's in user.lib. Apparently LV40 looks in user.lib when it starts as opposed to when you select the user library from the diagram toolbox, and is having a problem. I just don't understand why it worked in from 2002 to August and not in September.
09-21-2005 01:19 PM
09-21-2005 03:18 PM
Sorry that this seems to have turned into my personal blog on this issue...
In a somewhat blinding flash of the semi-obvious, I noted that all of the .vi, .seq an etc files were set with the read-only attribute. I had previously been backing up and restoring via Iomega Zips, but recently started CDs (Zips from the PC, CDs to restore), since burners are fairly common lately. Apparently when brning or restoring the R attribute is set.
I still had to remove the .mnu files, but now I can load the .seq files in test executive. Almost. LabVIEW crashes in the middle of the file load during the opening of the sequence file in test executive.
I guess the next step is to go in and load each .vi manually to see if there is one that is causing problems.
09-22-2005 12:47 AM
Hi Blair Hogg,
@Blair Hogg wrote:...guess the next step is to go in and load each .vi manually to see if there is one that is causing problems.
Hopefully some of you out there are finding this somewhat interesting, and I'm not just cluttering up the forum...
09-22-2005 02:27 PM
Philip,
Thanks for your suggestion. I've done the mass compile, it works here but not on the actual PC where LabVIEW will be deployed. It is helping me determine where the problem is and hopefully by tomorrow I'll have it corrected.
Blair