Force Variable VI is very sloooow

[Greg G.]

---

sachsm wrote:

Surely you are teasing me 🙂  Of course I would like all of the above since it will never be as efficient for me to have to intercept the scan engine data and process it myself.  Especially in regard to filtering since it would be

much better to do at the higher sample rates available in the scan engine.  My LPF currently runs at a sample rate of 50Hz.   But I think for now the greatest simplification would come from being able to externally manage the mx+b scaling.  Also a additional zero offset for on the fly calibration would be nice.  I understand you guys are trying to prioritize the most requested features and that managed mx+b scaling is high on the list.  Will there be any intermediate pioneer releases?  Can you state that it will be in the LV8.6.1 release?

---

Thanks for the info.  It really helps me to understand how you're using the product and what's missing from it.  I'm not promising we'll deliver any of the above, but there is a better chance of it now that we know what the need is 🙂

thanks,

greg

[Riconquistiamola]

sachsm,

I would like to contact you directly regarding this issue. May I have your permission to contact our web forums department to get your contact information?

Cheers.

[viScience]

Yes, you can contact me directly at mike.sachs@gmail.com or 256.544.7956

[Riconquistiamola]

This was reported to R&D (# 127980) for further investigation. Please contact your local Applications Engineering Department if this CAR is extremely detrimental to your development process.

Cheers.

[TLE]

I have some more input on the scaling of IO variables. 

1.  Look up table

2. Standard thermistor scaling