LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Event structure updates poorly when changing events connected to the "Reg Events" node

It seems the event structure maps dynamic events from the Event Registration Refnum using their position in the "Reg Events" node.

So when you add a new event before an already implemented one, you can get weird updates of the event frames...

 

Here is an example where an existing event is incorrectly replaced by a newly created event:

Bug - Resize Event Node - User Events.gif

 

Another example where an UI event on multiple controls is completely lost after a change to the node:

Bug - Resize Event Node - Controls.gif

To me the event structure should be smarter to map dynamic events to frames:

 

1. Either by multiple criterias:

- First by the name of the user event / control(s) constant;

- Then only if several events have the same name, use the index in the "Reg Events" node.

 

2. Or only by name and forbid registering several events with the same name.
Then the user may have to use the "Coerce to Type" function to rename controls arrays or clusters to give them a unique name.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 15
(1,689 Views)

I tried example #2 in LV 2018 SP1 and it seems to work correctly.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 15
(1,658 Views)

It's in LabVIEW 2020 SP1.

Here are the VIs to reproduce the problem.

For example #2 be sure to release the mouse after each resize to prevent LV from simply undoing the last move.

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 15
(1,657 Views)
Sorry, I just posted that data point just so we can maybe pinpoint when it started happening, not because I didn't believe you. 🙂
Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 15
(1,641 Views)

I'd assume user events are registered by the index#, so when you expand upwards, you get a new #1. Similar to how Enums can reacts. It should ofc try to keep it's named registration first hand.

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 15
(1,623 Views)

I also tested with LV2016 and LV2018 and it behaves exactly as I showed for LV2020.

So the "bug" was always there.

 

You can test with LV2018:

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 15
(1,601 Views)

I'm seeing the same issues with 2019SP1 and 2021SP1.

 

At least with the control register one, it really looks like it is an indexing issue, like it is adding 2 or 3 to the index when you expand up.  Notice that the "Unknown Event" is labeled as index 3 instead of what should be 0 or 1. If I had to take a wild guess, I would say the index is being added by the Register For Events and then again by the Event Structure trying to keep the event index synchronized.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 15
(1,596 Views)

@raphschru wrote:

I also tested with LV2016 and LV2018 and it behaves exactly as I showed for LV2020.

So the "bug" was always there.

 

You can test with LV2018:


Thank you for your patience.  I rebuilt your code incorrectly and now I can say I can see the described behavior as well.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 8 of 15
(1,593 Views)

I've never added a user event to the top like that before, but I have made room for one in the middle.  I wonder if we see similar issues and I just got lucky and because they were the same data type and I didn't write code for the events yet, so it didn't matter?

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 9 of 15
(1,591 Views)

With the controls array, my own guess is that the frame is initialliy linked to event #1.

After adding an element at the top, new event #1 is incompatible with the currently linked frame, so it goes to (nbr_of_events+1), so 3 in this case.

Then even when you remove the element you just added, the link is broken and stays #3.

You can test with e.g 5 user events, the frame will turn into #6.

Message 10 of 15
(1,588 Views)