10-07-2009 10:13 PM
Hello and have a nice day,
Hello,
I would like to ask one question about control time limit (seconds) which the setting is at Web Server Visible VIs. When i do the setting using .lvproj or project explorer. The default time 300second will not working when i run the application and client request to control the server. As attach, the timing is countdown is about 60 minutes. Is supposely just 5 minutes.
When i setting the web server directly from .vi, without using project explorer, it work well. So, i am really confusing why does this happen. Any solution how i can make it happen through project explorer? So that i can build the application EXE and installer program.
Regards,
zull
NI LabVIEW 8.6 Professional Version
10-12-2009 06:20 AM
Hi zull,
I am seeing the same problem with you on LabVIEW 8.0, 8.6 and 2009. But this problem does not arises if I do not use Project Explorer (use only single VI). Give me some time to check on this issue deeper.
As a workaround, You need to do it programmatically, both measuring the time and queue-dequeue the control access to the clients. I attached the example for your references, and also few links that I used to make the example:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=201307&requireLogin=False
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=441415&query.id=855028#M441415
Hope it helps!
Sincerely,
Krisna Wisnu
71899
10-12-2009 09:24 PM
Hello,
Thanks Krisna Wisnu for you reply. At least i have a share problem and i would try to look into with. I read about one forum in your link that told to
install a patch for 8.01 for LabVIEW 8 version. Is it LabVIEW 8.6 also have its patch also?
Okay. I would try to find the solution and any findings i would post again here.
Regards,
Zull
NI LabVIEW 8.6 Professional Version
10-14-2009 08:21 PM
Hi Zull,
We are filing a CAR on this issue, CAR #191614. It might be a bug, the only workaround that I know is to use the VI without a project or use the VI attached on my previous post. Thank you for noticing that.
Krisna Wisnu
12-10-2009 11:19 AM
Hi Krishna
did you get any further on that ?
I have a similiar problem and will start a new thread, but will continue to monitor this one.
Gabi
12-12-2009 05:37 AM
Hi Gabi,
No news yet, I think our team is still working on it. Most probably it would be fixed on next release. So, as workaround, you can use the VI above, or not to use the VI in a project. Does this applicable for your case?
Sincerely,
Krisna Wisnu