08-07-2020 09:56 AM
I've created blank bitfiles for NI-9862 in cRIO chassis [cRIO-9081, etc.] previously.
It's unclear to me if this is required for a cRIO-904x after reviewing these help documents:
1] This article leads me to believe that I do, as this is not an cRIO-903x or 906x:
https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z000000kKTtSAM&l=en-US
2] If I do create a blank bitfile, for the 9862 in the cRIO-9045 chassis, I get Error -63101 Deploying System Definition File With NI-986x in NI VeriStand. This article leads me to believe that I should not use a blank bitfile as I can deploy my project. Unfortunately, our CANbus for this project is still in development so I have not been able to test if it works. Just looking for clarification / possible update to these Knowledge Articles.
https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z000000P6W9SAK&l=en-US
Thank you
09-02-2020 01:59 PM
Everything appears to be functional without the use of a bitfile.
09-03-2020 12:38 AM - edited 09-03-2020 12:38 AM
Linux cRIOs don't need the bitfile...
CLA, CTA
09-03-2020 07:34 AM
Thank you for confirming this - it is good news and saves us a step in setting up our controllers which change I/O frequently for test needs. Please update the referenced support documents to reflect this [ie. add cRIO-904x].
The creation of this bitfile can be relatively simple, however, at times it is not.....on our company network, I have to use my phone as a hotspot to cloud compile because our firewall blocks the cloud compiler. Often times, after creation of the FPGA bitfile in LabVIEW, I must reformat the target and reinstall all VeriStand + drivers on the cRIO.