VeriStand

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

cRIO-9045 XNET 9862 Blank Bitfile?

I've created blank bitfiles for NI-9862 in cRIO chassis [cRIO-9081, etc.] previously.  

 

It's unclear to me if this is required for a cRIO-904x after reviewing these help documents:

 

1]  This article leads me to believe that I do, as this is not an cRIO-903x or 906x:  

 

https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z000000kKTtSAM&l=en-US 

 

2]  If I do create a blank bitfile, for the 9862 in the cRIO-9045 chassis, I get Error -63101 Deploying System Definition File With NI-986x in NI VeriStand.  This article leads me to believe that I should not use a blank bitfile as I can deploy my project.  Unfortunately, our CANbus for this project is still in development so I have not been able to test if it works.  Just looking for clarification / possible update to these Knowledge Articles.

 

https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z000000P6W9SAK&l=en-US

 

Thank you

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(1,679 Views)

Everything appears to be functional without the use of a bitfile.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(1,580 Views)

Linux cRIOs don't need the bitfile...

CLA, CTA

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(1,574 Views)

Thank you for confirming this - it is good news and saves us a step in setting up our controllers which change I/O frequently for test needs.  Please update the referenced support documents to reflect this [ie. add cRIO-904x]. 

 

The creation of this bitfile can be relatively simple, however, at times it is not.....on our company network, I have to use my phone as a hotspot to cloud compile because our firewall blocks the cloud compiler.  Often times, after creation of the FPGA bitfile in LabVIEW, I must reformat the target and reinstall all VeriStand + drivers on the cRIO.

 

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(1,567 Views)