SimSurg:
A Low-cost Cricothyroidotomy Simulator
with Real-Time Feedback System
Abdul Aref (Hardware Engineer)
Joey Peroski (Systems Engineer)
Rob Przybylski (Software Engineer)
Dan Westcott (Software Engineer)
Introduction
Many trauma related surgical procedures cannot ethically be practiced by medical students or
inexperienced doctors. Therefore, medical simulators that provide high anatomical and procedural fidelity
are used. One of the most important things to monitor during such a procedure is the vital signs of the
patient. One specific procedure that this is important for is a cricothyroidotomy, in which an emergency
incision through the skin and cricothyroid membrane is made to secure a patient's airway during certain
emergency situations, such as an airway obstructed by a foreign object or swelling and a patient who is
not able to breathe adequately on his own. Current simulators that provide live feedback to the trainee
including the most necessary vital signs are very expensive. The amount of cases per doctor is further
amplified in many developing countries, with many of these clinicians not being able to practice before
being in the real life situation. High fidelity trauma simulators are in high demand in the developing
world, yet the training institutions in these countries do not have the means to acquire them. Therefore, a
low cost and high fidelity cricothyroidotomy simulator with a live feedback system that tells the clinician
the vital signs of the patient including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen content, and
ECG was developed.
Experimental Design
The hardware portion of the system consisted of a foam model of a human head, larynx and
trachea made of rubber-based materials, a differential pressure sensor positioned to take readings within
the trachea, and a circuit to increase signal strength from the sensor as well as to reduce signals with
frequencies higher than 3Hz. The output from the circuit to the software was fed into a data acquisition
board and analyzed using National Instruments LabVIEW 8.6 (a screen shot of the LabVIEW block
diagram can be found in Figure 1 in the Appendix). Two emergency medicine doctors, an
anesthesiologist, and an expert in clinical simulation helped to write the algorithms for the software. The
two different types of patients that algorithms were written to simulate were a healthy 25 year-old male
and a 75 year-old male with COPD and taking beta blockers. A user interface that displays what the
patient monitor information a clinician would see in the real life situation was also developed. Vital signs
consisted of heart rate and associated ECG chart; systolic and diastolic blood pressure; oxygen saturation;
and frequency of contraction of respiratory muscles. The simulation began at the onset of an airway
obstruction. Trainees started the experiment by making a 1 cm vertical incision through the skin and
cricothyroid membrane. Following opening of the hole via a 90-degree turn of the scalpel, a 6 mm
internal diameter tracheostomy tube was inserted. The cuff was inflated and the tube was secured. A bag
valve device was attached, and the trainee provided ventilation by compressing the bag once every four
seconds.
Vital sign information was displayed depending on existence and duration of an unobstructed
airway. Trainees began the experiment by making an incision into the airway and inserting a
tracheostomy tube. A resuscitation bag device was attached. LabVIEW acquired data from the
differential pressure sensor and circuit and displayed it on a voltage-time chart in successive 10-second
windows. Peak voltage values were obtained for each window with or without the bag being compressed,
representing the successful and unsuccessful establishment of an airway, respectively. Likert scale
surveys were completed by each trainee to determine usefulness and accuracy of the simulator.
Results
An image of the user interface that the physician sees can be found in Figure 2 in the Appendix.
The voltage data output from the differential pressure sensor was collected and analyzed. The average
Vmax value obtained while the clinician was not ventilating the simulator (no flow) was 2.46 ± 0.005 V.
The average Vmax value obtained while the clinician was ventilating the patient (airflow present) was
2.66 ± 0.010 V. Performance of an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test, with an alpha value of 0.05,
yielded a p-value of 1.87E-20, indicating that there is a significant difference in Vmax over a 10 second
window between scenarios with no airflow and airflow present and that the simulation is repeatable. The
design and medical application of the simulator was approved by physicians via a survey that was
conducted (a copy of the survey conducted can be found in Table 1 in the Appendix). Through the
analysis of results discussed above, it was deduced that the acceptance criteria, which were differentiation
between no airflow and airflow, reproducibility, and physician approval, were met. Thus, the simulator
was suggested to accurately mimic realistic physiological responses and anatomical structure.
Discussion and Conclusion
As always, there are sources of error in this experiment. First, there is the differential pressure
sensor, which has to be calibrated every time we start using it. If calibration is not performed, then the
LabVIEW program may pick up false positives in terms of breaths. Also, another source of error for this
simulator is that fact that some of the electronic components have 5% tolerances, meaning that the value
of any of these components could be off by 5%. This would ultimately be another source of error in the
system. Yet another source of error in the system is introduced since the procedure is dependent on the
performance of a trainee. If the trainee inserts the tracheostomy tube improperly, or does not apply
airflow in the correct manner, then the results would be skewed, thus introducing another source of error
to the system.
The system can be improved in several ways to yield more accurate results. First, it would be
helpful to incorporate a live feedback feature in the LabVIEW program, where the physician can monitor
the patient’s vitals in real time instead of every 10 seconds. Also, another improvement that can make this
simulator better is incorporating more algorithms for various types of patients and conditions instead of
just the two current situations. This will allow for the residents to train with simulations of patients more
like what they would encounter in the field; not every patient is going to be a healthy 25 year-old male or
an unhealthy elderly person. Another improvement to the simulator would be to cover the chest cavity to
achieve a more anatomically correct model as well as to address safety concerns with the freely accessible
circuit.
Applications
Future work includes writing multiple algorithms for various types of patients and the
development of low-cost and high fidelity simulators with live feedback systems for other various trauma
procedures. Algorithms for passive patient recovery could be formulated to simulate the recovery of the
patient after the execution of a successful cricothyroidotomy. Also, a CO2 meter that displays the CO2
percentage of air released from the lungs could be incorporated to inform the physician if the patient is
exhaling or not. Another future direction would be to make the simulator into a portable setup. This
would allow the training of residents in remote locations of underdeveloped countries.
This system will allow the training of residents and physicians to be completed under a low-risk
environment. This will result in better-trained physicians who will be able to perform the
cricothyroidotomy procedure accurately and with less risk to the patient. The feasibility and impact of
training clinicians and medical students in low resource settings such as Ghana and other underdeveloped
countries in West Africa has shown much promise and work is continuing to grow in this area of research.
Attachment: Original Report