From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

Signal Conditioning

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NI-9250 or NI-9232 for the Wilcoxon Amphenol 997-M4

Sorry for the naive question, but it is my first time designing the acquisition of a sensor.

I would like to ask what is the proper hw for the excitation and signal conditioning of the sensor Wilcoxon Amphenol 997-M4, whose spec (997-M4 high frequency accelerometer with integral cable (wilcoxon.com) states "bias voltage output: 12 VDC"- Does the NI-9250 (+- 5V) properly handle the signal conditioning? What should I look at to check for the right compatibility?

 

Thank you.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(792 Views)

both unit support IEPE,

if you only need a range up to 500g the 9250 is fine and has a higher speced stability and lower noise.. (but you dominant noise source is the sensor 😉 )

if you go for high amplitudes at high frequencies and/or longer (20m + ) cables the 9232 with its higher drive current (4mA vs 2mA) seems a better choice. 

or if you want to measure down to (or below) 0.5 Hz the 9232 has a lower high pass , however your sensor is speced with 0.5 (-3db)  as well as the 9250, so no real problem.

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(763 Views)

Thank you for the the technical aspects mentioned.

 

As far as I understood, considering the mentioned sensor, its sensitivity is 10mV/g with a peak full-scale of 600g. In other words it outputs +-6 VDC (the 12VDC Bias Voltage Output mentioned in the spec).

Your rationale is that with a module whose voltage maps to +-5V satures the acceleration between 500-600g. So if they are not needed, that is not a problem, otherwise I would need the 9232.

 

The other rationale is about the excitation current, this depends on the cable distance and EM noise as far as I understood. In other words, if the setup is confined the 2mA excitation current should be enough.

 

The rationale about low and high frequencies are new and appreciated. I will investigate them.

 

What about the general AI 9025 module. What is it missing w.r.t the excitation and signal conditioning of the dedicated modules? What kind of HW should I integrate and how? Are there any experiences of past users I can look at?

 

Thank you,

Luca

 

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(754 Views)

@lmaurelli wrote:

 

What about the general AI 9025 module. What is it missing w.r.t the excitation and signal conditioning of the dedicated modules? What kind of HW should I integrate and how? Are there any experiences of past users I can look at?

 

Thank you,

Luca

 


The NI 9025 is a cRIO chassis. Are you referring to the 9225? That has no excitation outputs at all.

Rolf Kalbermatter
My Blog
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(298 Views)