05-09-2017 07:16 AM - edited 05-09-2017 07:17 AM
Hi,
I need some help and/or insights on how to manage a production test floor. Anything helpful will be appreciated!
Situation is this (numbers are just for illustration):
And then there are these issues:
Are there any existing NI or 3rd party tools or solutions to manage this? Basically what I need is a way of controlling changes and delivering them to multiple test station. Knowing what station has what configuration is a must. Everything can be done manually (checking, deploying, book keeping, etc.) using spreadsheets, but manual work is error prone.
Is there an industry standard good practice or practices for this?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-09-2017 10:47 AM - last edited on 12-03-2024 09:32 AM by Content Cleaner
Have you seen this document: https://www.ni.com/en/support/documentation/supplemental/08/teststand-system-deployment-best-practic...
It is an interesting way to tackle the problem. However, it is not an off the shelf solution like you are looking for. You would need to implement some of the parts to make it work well.
I own a company that specializes in TestStand frameworks and architectures. This issue is one we've been discussing lately. I'm curious what you think some of the requirements a tool like this would need to have?
Our idea is that a database, or look up table, would link the part number to a set of "packages". Then a thin client/GUI would be installed on the deployment machine. It would then do a checksum against a shared drive repository of "packages" and what is local. It would then download any deltas and then execute. This way the user can dust off a test computer and it will update itself through the thin client. You no longer have to manage the machines.
Regards,
05-10-2017 01:24 AM
Hi jigg,
Thank you for your reply. I was thinking about exact same approach as you describe.
We already use a versioning system for our projects and do something similar to what is described in the document you attached, but manually.
I can also imagine other scenarios where having an equipment and project database like this would help with both typical and emergency management/support activities.
What I don't look forward to is starting our own in-house solution for this from scratch.