NI TestStand Idea Exchange

About NI TestStand Idea Exchange

Do you have a feature idea for how to improve NI TestStand? Submit and vote on ideas now!

  1. Browse by label or search in the TestStand Idea Exchange to see if your idea has previously been submitted. If your idea exists sure to vote for the idea by giving it kudos to indicate your approval!
  2. If your idea has not been submitted click Post New Idea to submit a product idea. Be sure to submit a separate post for each idea. Note: the TestStand Idea Exchange is not the appropriate forum to submit technical support questions.
  3. Watch as the community gives your idea kudos and adds their input.
  4. As NI R&D considers the idea, they will change the idea status.
  5. Give kudos to other ideas that you would like to see implemented!

The TestStand R&D team is committed to reviewing every idea submitted via the TestStand Idea Exchange. However, we cannot guarantee the implementation of any TestStand Idea Exchange submission until further documented.

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
menic

Add a "No Comparison" comparison type to the String Value Test

I'd like to see a "No Comparison" comparison type added to the String Value Test.

 

Currently there are only two options for comparison type on the String Value Test: "CaseSensitive" and "IgnoreCase".  I have often wished there was a "No Comparison" option similar to what is available for the Numeric Limit Test.  Sometimes you want to pass a string to the test report in the result field that neither passes nor fails the test.

4 Comments
warren_scott
Active Participant
menic
Member
It seems so. But as that link is 3 1/2 years old and the feature hasn't been implemented, the discussion could be reopened.
dug9000
Trusted Enthusiast

Ideas don't expire. Creating a duplicate is likely just going to split the kudos. It's best to kudo and/or add a comment to the original idea rather than create a duplicate.

 

Just letting you know.

-Doug

WireWeaver
Active Participant
Status changed to: Duplicate