Multisim and Ultiboard Idea Exchange

Community Browser
About Multisim and Ultiboard Idea Exchange
Do you have an idea for how to improve Multisim and Ultiboard? Submit and vote on ideas now!

  1. Browse by label or search in the Multisim and Ultiboard Idea Exchange to see if your idea has previously been submitted. If it has, be sure to vote for the idea by giving it kudos to indicate your approval!
  2. If your idea has not been submitted click the New Idea button to submit a product idea. Be sure to submit a separate post for each idea.
  3. Watch as the community gives your idea kudos and adds their input.
  4. As NI R&D considers the idea, they will change its status.
  5. Give kudos to other ideas that you would like to see in a future version of Multisim!

The Multisim and Ultiboard R&D team is committed to reviewing every idea submitted via the Multisim and Ultiboard Idea Exchange. However, we cannot guarantee the implementation of any Multisim & Ultiboard Idea Exchange submission.

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Post an idea

Hello everyone

It would be great if we could add a dummy object. I mean a schematic element that represents only the footprint. There are so many items that are not in your library. It seems a good idea if I could select a "DIP14" entry without a simulator behind it.
Only to be able to create a simple schematic...

It would be nice if PDF/SVG/LaTeX PGF export of Multisim Live Graph and Circuit to include it in academic literature like papers, books...

There are much more footprints of connectors available in Ultiboard than in Multisim. To create a correct circuit diagramm I need the same foortprints in Multisim. There are not enough connectors in Multisim.

It would be very helpful to have all the connectors in Multisim too!

Instead of identifying errors by double clicking on the Yellow X of entry in DRC Tab of spread sheet, double click on the error circle marker in the workspace to automatically point to the error in the list under the DRC Tab.

 

Sounds simple, should be easy to add feature.

 

This way all errors associated with a section of the layout can be systematically fixed.

 

John E Kimura, Ph.D. Cantab

Sensorium, Inc.

President and CEO

MK Design, Inc.

 

As Einstein put it, “The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”

"We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." - Carl Sagan

Hi, i am a inventer building and winding my own coils

since your program is perfect for testing differant windings i have a few things i want you to add

 

multilayers sow for instand a 4 layer transformer

select with type of wire and the gauge witch automaticty calculates the ohms

the shape of the coil turoid or tesla coil like

the core itself, i would like an option to use a micrometalmix core or an aircore

 

thanks in advance

The only way to do a horizontal cylinder is a resistor body between pins.  Often other configurations of horizontal cylinders are needed.  i.e. tubular radial resistor that lays over on it's side, some relay bodies, and various mechanical objects that don't have axial electrical pins. 

 

I've had to resort to horizontal rectangles to do this, which does not convey the image very accurately.

Since netnames, power supply names and sheet connector names are not actually parts there is no conflict for naming a refdes the same as one of these.  I believe this used to be OK in some previous version of MS.

 

This would be very useful for test point parts.

 

Does anyone even read these ideas?

 

I'd like to have an option for easily copy-pasting customized SPICE options from one Active Analysis to another. Either through saving to a file and loading to the options of another analysis, or simply as a "copy settings from another analysis" button.

 

It would also be nice to have a way to collect/save known working option-sets for various types of designs, separately from the actual design files.

 

When a new version is released and installed it resets all configs, preferred paths, libraries, etc. to defaults.

 

It would be far more friendly to inherent the settings from the previously installed version instead of doing this.  Almost all other app updates I get seem to be able to do this with no problem.

 

 New versions (last 14.1) can't even load the configs from the previous version, so it's left to the user to re-create them from scratch.

 

 

1. Increase Width of all traces together in the grapher.

2. Option to choose axis variables in the grapher, for example instead of time in the x-axis, I need some circuit voltage, for this option the simulator should simulate for all circuit variables, and after completion of simulation, the user could change the axis variables as desired. ( In PSPICE it happens the same way, and its useful)

3. When inductors are coupled using Inductor Coupling Block, then those inductors should be assigned dot polarity, same should also be done for the transformer models.

4. When I perform Transient, DC Sweep or Parameter Sweep analysis, all the selected output variables are plotted on the same graph, this is good for most of the times,
but sometimes I desire them to be plotted on 'Different Graph but on Same Graph Page' and I know this can be done by copying the original graph and paste it on the same page and then deselect the unwanted variables, which is tedious work. So there should be an additonal option to plot the variables on 'Different Graph but on Same Graph Page'. Also user should be able to change the bottom axis range of all graph together for easy comparision.

5. Is it possible to incoporate the datasheet of components within the multisim, without visiting manufacturer's webpage?

6. I desire the multisim to create backup of all custom setting made to it (for example Keyboard Shorcuts), so that I could restore it in case of new installation.

7. Multisim Viewer for viewing the schematics and simulating them

Since EAGLE has become so widespread many part manufacturers provide part libraries as EAGLE files downloads.

It would be really useful to be able to import these EAGLE part libraries into the Ultiboard database.

So far so good.

It would be awesome if Multisim Live included also the Multimeter feature, as the PC software.

 

Cheers

I am using Multim Touch form the applestore and I am very satisfied. But...

How about a Pro version of Multisim Touch with a price tag around 30.0 U$S but with more capabilities

like being able to use self-defined models, having some more components form the beginnig and being able

to exchange files (like models for instance) over iTunes in the App section.

I think educators and hobbyst would most likely be very inetersted.

 
 
 

It would be helpful in more complicated designs to have an option to color nets. Currently Ultiboard offers only "Highlight net" option, but it highlights only one net, with a predefined color and disapperas after doing something else. Net coloring allows to glance and see, for example, power pins locations.

 

Regards,

Piotr Falkowski

Hardware Engineer, ZF TRW

UB differential pair groups should be able to specify how close to equal length is required.

 

There is almost always some amount of length matching error.  Not being able to specify allowed error means you will always get a DRC when you have matched length nets.

 Ultiboard's single interface for layout and simulation with ultiboard's new parts spice model library and all the test instuments from multisim
Status: New    
by Member dubmaster ‎02-19-2016 12:18 PM - edited ‎02-19-2016 12:22 PM

Set up ultiboard with all the test instruments and spice models  like multisim. You would do away with multisim and develope a single interface within ultiboard to simulate and design and layout ....

 
You would place the parts on the board, i.e. transformer ,diode caps wire them  like you do in multisim, place test instrument ...

 
This would save time because you would place parts where the are to be , have the ability to run simulation within ultiboard  single interface ..

 
Place a 741 op amp from the ultiboard library that would have the foot print and spice model with in ultiboard , place the feed back resistor ..

 

 

It kinda make no sense to lay out twice , once in multisim , then ultiboard , the single interface would be king..

 

The New symbol

 

UBNS.png

 

The Scientist

 

http://www.dubmusic.com/thescientist/youtube/p=2

Update Multisim Touch to take advantage of iOS 9 side-by-side multitasking features.

Hello 

 

is it possible to do ? -

ZOOM SHEET - F7  - to apply to all active sheets and sub sheets together.

 

 

if it is not now, it would be nice to have in next revision

 

thanks

 

Michael

We have been asking for this for several years now and there is never a response.  It makes us loyal users start thinking about changing design package vendors and it must be limiting new sales.  

 

When will these symbol and footprint libraries be supported!?

Utiboard has some windows and fields to create net, buses and component groups in the "Group Editor" tool. The bus groups are required if you want to autoroute a particular bus. However, there's no creation of a bus group when you create a bus in Multisim, so this have to be done manually in Ultiboard, and the back annotate it to Multisim. So I think that is a good idea to have the same "Group Editor" window in Multisim, and also automtically add Buses to Bus Groups. Also, another related enhancement could be the creation of component's "Room Property" (like OrCAD) for components that need to be near in the PCB as passive components for medium to high speed IC's, and use this property to automatically create a component group, and also aid Autorouters to impose particular constraints for this group, like trace length, impedance, and maximum via count. This can increase success and speed of ultiboard Autorouter, or make manual placing and routing much faster.

aestay_0-1618845709713.png