Hello all, I am trying to determine whether cDAQ or cRIO would be better to measure strain gauge, temperature (thermocouple), and accelerometer data from devices placed on a Formula SAE vehicle. Currently, I have both chassis (cDAQ and cRIO), as well as, all the modules needed (9237, 9213, and 9234) for the measuring devices. My concern comes from not having very much experience in determining which system is better in terms of counters/triggers, output, and device management. Also, where gathered data is stored and if a computer is always needed to be connected, etc. If anyone would be willing to share their experiences with either chassis in a similar senario that would be great. Thanks, Kevin

Multifunction DAQ

This topic is a bit old, but good news is that NI just released cRIO 9045

To my understanding 9045 is both a cRIO and cDAQ.

I heard the price is the same or close to cRIO 9035.

Message 11 of 13

(1,799 Views)

Does NI 9045 support both Windows and Linux ????

Message 12 of 13

(1,735 Views)

According to the manual, the supported operating system is only NI RT Linux.

Message 13 of 13

(1,730 Views)

What do you need our team of experts to assist you with?

How can we help?

Please enter your information below and we'll be intouch soon.

This field is required

Preferred communication method

Email Phone call

What do you need our team of experts to assist you with?