08-06-2018 03:46 AM
Hi,
I am in the process of compiling a sensor system for an offshore asset using accelerometers. The differential voltage signal is transferred in a twisted pair cabled and is connected to data acquisition (NI-9239) via BNC. In my testing it seems that a lot of noise is introduced in the connector between the cable and the data acquisition equipment. Do you have any recommendations on how to connect a twisted pair cable to a NI-9239 via BNC? Or commonly used connectors from twisted pair to BNC?
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-06-2018 10:01 AM
The accelerometers already have signal condinioners? (IEPE with 10 to 20 mA is a common long cable field application, however the 9239 has no IEPE support... and the usual 2-4mA IEPE supply can work but sometimes the extra low impedance help 😉 )
Output impedance?
How long is your twisted pair?
Can you try a lower the input impedance (1k-10k) ?
08-07-2018 01:38 AM
Thanks for the response Henrik.
I see that my original post could use a bit more information.
I have nine accelerometers where the only difference is the cabling. For four of them I use the following cable:
For the rest I use the following pigtail in combination a terminal to BNC adaptor:
With this setup I get the following RMS-values at idle:
It is pretty evident that something goes wrong for sensor 5-9. As the cables are from the same manufacturer I assume that it is the connector that is to blame. I have also tried splicing the pigtail to a BNC cable, but I am not able to achieve better results using that setup.
08-07-2018 03:35 AM - edited 08-07-2018 03:39 AM
What are the types and sensitivities (cal-data) of your sensors?
The RMS voltage noise is about 3.5 times higher, a 8315A2D0 4000mV/g to 8330B... 1200mV/g matches 3.3 times the sensitivity 😉
How does it look like if you compare scaled RMS values?
(assuming all sensors see about the same input :D)
08-07-2018 04:03 AM
All sensors are 8316A2D0D0TA00:
https://www.kistler.com/?type=669&fid=78520&model=document
The sensitivity is very close to 4000 mV/g.
08-07-2018 04:39 AM
Have you checked (pin to pin) both cable connections to be equal?
You want pin 1 & 2 to for +- power and 4&3 for +-signal..
The 1786D cable seems to be wrong according to this doc:
https://www.kistler.com/?type=669&fid=79055&callee=frontend
08-07-2018 05:10 AM
It seems that I have used a wrong picture of the cable. The correct name is 1786C10 and it looks like this:
08-07-2018 05:20 AM - edited 08-07-2018 05:23 AM
And how is it wired?
IF the power - and signal - are swaped the sensor migth still work (due to protection diodes) but you get only half the amplitude...
Just check the connections to be pin to pin equal and correct 😉
08-07-2018 06:51 AM
I have just checked the cable and I am quite surprised. The "good" cable is single ended and not for differential voltage as it should be.
I am very grateful for your help Henrik. Thanks!