06-29-2005 06:23 PM
06-30-2005 05:36 PM
06-30-2005 06:41 PM
07-01-2005 11:58 AM - edited 07-01-2005 11:58 AM
Message Edited by WM John Weeks on 07-01-2005 10:00 AM
07-01-2005 01:07 PM - edited 07-01-2005 01:07 PM
From John: "Well, you managed to get in another posting while I was composing my reply. Do you have to use Traditional NI-DAQ?"
That's a great question- Mike, is there a specific reason you need to use Traditional NI-DAQ?
I have attached an example that outputs a single cycle of a buffer that you define; in my case I have built a 5000 point sine wave of amplitude 5V. I think you'll see that NI-DAQmx is much easier to program with and understand. It also offers increased performance.
Your card supports NI-DAQmx, so I would strongly suggest you consider using this API for programming. Please let us know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks-
Message Edited by Tom W. on 07-01-2005 01:08 PM