From 04:00 PM CDT – 08:00 PM CDT (09:00 PM UTC – 01:00 AM UTC) Tuesday, April 16, will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

Multifunction DAQ

Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Generate Trigger output and triggered AO

The code looks good with respect to sync and timing dependency issues.  I have just one suggestion which isn't *necessary* for this app, but I'd recommend it as a good habit.  


In your AI call to DAQmx Read, I'd wire in the # samples to read rather than leaving it unwired.  Unwired will use the default value of -1, which carries the special meaning, "read all available samples from the buffer (that haven't previously been read already".   In this particular app, the finite pulse train and your sequencing controls the # samples so you'll end up getting the correct #.  But I find it helpful to wire in values explicitly to make sure I pause and think about what behavior I really want.


One common AI DAQ pattern is to call DAQmx Read in a loop.  Wiring in a # samples will act to control the iteration timing of the loop.  Leaving it unwired allows the loop to iterate as fast as the other code in the loop can stand for.  A common mistake found in postings here are when people leave the # samples value unwired in the loop.  As a result, the loop iterates as fast as it can, and may sometimes find 0 available new samples to read, leading to various kinds of data problems.

   So I think it's best to make the habit of wiring a value explicitly, even if the value you wire is the default value -1.



-Kevin P

CAUTION! New LabVIEW adopters -- it's too late for me, but you *can* save yourself. The new subscription policy for LabVIEW puts NI's hand in your wallet for the rest of your working life. Are you sure you're *that* dedicated to LabVIEW? (Summary of my reasons in this post, part of a voluminous thread of mostly complaints starting here).
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 12

Thanks for the reply. I just saw now that you actually answered to my last post. 


In the actual program there is no AI function. I just put it here as a test. I first apply and then directly read the applied voltages. I understand your point though and will try to remember it next time I actually use an AI function 🙂



0 Kudos
Message 12 of 12