Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

no connection "required" for VI outputs?

My bad, I thought LV was supposed to let the user develop their own software and handle errors as they saw fit 🙂

But then I never read the EULA and just click on the "Accept" buttons like a fool.

I don't think the argument that automatic error handling will reduce support requirements for novice users holds much water. But maybe it is supported by hard data...

And I should add, if somebody chooses not to handle errors automatically, then this "require output error terminals to be connected" option could be made available.

0 Kudos
Message 31 of 34

I don't know any more than you. I'm just speculating on the thoughts behind the game.



Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
0 Kudos
Message 32 of 34

Suggestion posted here and linked back to this thread.

0 Kudos
Message 33 of 34

It turns out I had already posted the suggestion here...

0 Kudos
Message 34 of 34