LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

in range and coerce on time stamps

Solved!
Go to solution

Is there any reason why I shouldn't be able to use in range and coerce on time stamps?  In this VI the value is not being coerced, but the output for in-range is false.  With values out of range, it DOES coerce the output.  Smiley Mad

 

Timestamps.png

Jim

LV 2020
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(3,016 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author lmtis

Making the possible error of replying without first testing... is it possible the problem is that you have the upper and lower limits swapped? Timestamps are numbers, and later dates are larger numbers. Since 12 is greater than 8, the upper limit should be 12/11/2014, and the lower limit should be 8/11/2014.

 

EDIT: after testing, yes, that's definitely the problem. Swap your upper and lower limits and it will work as expected.

Message 2 of 4
(3,008 Views)

:manembarrassed:What a NOOB mistake!

 

Thank you nathand

Jim

LV 2020
Message 3 of 4
(2,995 Views)

@lmtis wrote:

:manembarrassed:What a NOOB mistake!

 

Thank you nathand


LOL The next noob minstake is forgetting to mark the person's post that solved the issue for you as the solution.  😉

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
Message 4 of 4
(2,968 Views)