On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 14:11:03 GMT, ken_eric@my-deja.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Checked for break points and there were none. Came up with neither the
>red dot nor a positive on the deliberate search. Now I know how to
>check for breaks in the future though...:)
>
You could also check out for a red frame on the inside of a case,
while, sequence or for loop. It indicates a brekpint set on that
frame.
Regards
Rolf
>
>
>In article <981116177.21044.0.pluto.d4ee054f@news.demon.nl>,
> "AIR Tech. Autom." wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You've probbably placed a breakpoint somewhere. This can be seen in
>the
>> diagram as a small red dot. If you cannot find it, use "project" from
>the
>> menu, "Find", select the object "Breakpoi
nt" in "Other".
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Wiebe Walstra.
>>
>> Note: To place them, make the tools palate visible, select the red
>dot, with
>> arrow, and put it in the diagram.
>>
>> --
>> AIR technical Automation
>> www.air.nl
>> wrote in message
>news:95e40d$l83$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
>> An easy newbie question for you die-hards out there...
>>
>> I have a program that upon execution, forces the wiring window to the
>> forefront and pauses over a certain area of code. There is apparently
>> nothing wrong with this part of the code (a simple case structure), as
>I
>> can click to unpause or step over with no error messages whenever the
>> program gets to this point. This hold-up is annoying because it halts
>> up the rest of the program and I don't see the point of it.
>>
>> My question is wheter or not it is possible to force the program not
>to
>> pause and ask me for redundant stepping requests. Conversely, is it
>> possible to force pauses at particular points i
n the program? Might
>> have done it uninentionally...