LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Venting: If the help function opens a page in a browser, load times need to be a tenth of what they are now.

We have just switched from LV 2021 to 2024, and now some nodes have their detailed help in the web instead of the integrated help functionality.

Watching a blank page for 20s is a dismal user experience for a feature that has replaced a perfectly functional solution.

Message 1 of 4
(458 Views)

Hi Florian,

 

You are right, the online help as it is now is quite useless for everyday coding.

 

Here is a way to make LV open the offline help instead:

https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Offline-Help-window-in-LabVIEW-2022/m-p/4251163#M1236962

 

For me it takes "only" 5s to open a help page when the NI Offline Help Viewer is closed, and 3s to refresh the page when it is already open.

It is still a bit long for an offline help, but way faster than the online one.

 

Regards,

Raphaël.

Message 2 of 4
(404 Views)

@raphschru wrote:

Hi Florian,

 

You are right, the online help as it is now is quite useless for everyday coding.

 

Here is a way to make LV open the offline help instead:

https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Offline-Help-window-in-LabVIEW-2022/m-p/4251163#M1236962

 

For me it takes "only" 5s to open a help page when the NI Offline Help Viewer is closed, and 3s to refresh the page when it is already open.

It is still a bit long for an offline help, but way faster than the online one.

 

Regards,

Raphaël.


As far as I know,  NOBODY has ever been happy about the load time for the newer help file.  It doesn't matter if you load the online or offline version the load time cannot seem to become as fast or faster than when opening a *.chm file.  But, that quick access to chm is exactly why that format had to be replaced by more secure technology. 

 

Think of how happy you would be if your online banking app was %50 faster but let any hacker with a gradeschool education exploit your file storage and retrieval.  Yes, chm is that vulnerable!


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(389 Views)

@JÞB wrote:

@raphschru wrote:

Hi Florian,

 

You are right, the online help as it is now is quite useless for everyday coding.

 

Here is a way to make LV open the offline help instead:

https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Offline-Help-window-in-LabVIEW-2022/m-p/4251163#M1236962

 

For me it takes "only" 5s to open a help page when the NI Offline Help Viewer is closed, and 3s to refresh the page when it is already open.

It is still a bit long for an offline help, but way faster than the online one.

 

Regards,

Raphaël.


As far as I know,  NOBODY has ever been happy about the load time for the newer help file.  It doesn't matter if you load the online or offline version the load time cannot seem to become as fast or faster than when opening a *.chm file.  But, that quick access to chm is exactly why that format had to be replaced by more secure technology. 

 

Think of how happy you would be if your online banking app was %50 faster but let any hacker with a gradeschool education exploit your file storage and retrieval.  Yes, chm is that vulnerable!


Reducing the help to "just help".  It used to do so much more, like being able to find the VI in the palette or drop it onto your BD.  But I guess that's a vulnerability in itself.  If I'm not mistaken, the help file isn't even fully functional yet, with broken links and stuff.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(343 Views)