> I'm using a type 2 global variable because I need a big data array shared by
> two parallel VI.
> The big data array is contained by an indicator in the front panel because
> this big data is an output of the load method.
> This big data array is an input of other methods so as in the LV example, a
> local variable of the big data array is used as input and I have not wired
> the big data array indicator as ouput for these methods in order to avoid to
> duplicate my big data array.
> The result is surprising because:
> After the load method, the outputs are right.
> The inputs of an other method is correct (local variable) but the data array
> changed although I don't changed it .
> So the inputs of the second other method are wrong.
>
> So, I suppose I have to rewri
te my big array at every method call, what lose
> a lot of time and memory.
Its not exactly clear why you are doing this. A global can't be written
to by
a local, and neither of your options have mentioned a wire going from function
one to function two. I'd suggest that you may not need to use a global
at all,
just a wire.
If you are using a LV2 style global, then you make a call to a subVI
that returns
the needed data on a wire and passes it to the rest of the diagram. This method
doesn't save anything if you are always accessing the entire array.
Greg McKaskle