From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

References: Appearance different in Development System and in Run Time System

Solved!
Go to solution

I noticed a difference the references appearance in Development System and in Run Time System.  It seems to have no effect in the executable version but, per curiosity, someone have an explanation?

 

 

 

Development System

 

Development.jpg

 

 

 

Run Time System

 

Run-time.jpg

 

 

 

 

Jean-Marc

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(2,386 Views)

When LabVIEW builds an executable, it removes the parts which are not needed from the VIs (like BDs, or FPs of VIs which will not be opened). I'm assuming this is an extension of that where the icon is not copied over. Another option is that the RTE is simply missing the code necessary to display this specific this.

In any case, I would say it's a bug, albeit a minor one.


___________________
Try to take over the world!
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(2,362 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author J-M

tst wrote:

When LabVIEW builds an executable, it removes the parts which are not needed from the VIs (like BDs, or FPs of VIs which will not be opened). I'm assuming this is an extension of that where the icon is not copied over. Another option is that the RTE is simply missing the code necessary to display this specific this.

In any case, I would say it's a bug, albeit a minor one.


I don't think this is a bug, the references refere to a given CTL file, which is not present in the RTE, I think LabVIEW disconnects the reference form the typedef and only saves the properties needed.
Ton
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas

LabVIEW, programming like it should be!
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(2,345 Views)

Thanks for the information TonP ant tst.

 

Jean-Marc

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(2,331 Views)