LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Playing back a waveform

Solved!
Go to solution

I have to say that it would be nice to have the t0 timestamp on the captured waveform be relative to the beginning of the capture.

 

 

 

========================
=== Engineer Ambiguously ===
========================
Message 41 of 44
(312 Views)

@RTSLVU wrote:

I have to say that it would be nice to have the t0 timestamp on the captured waveform be relative to the beginning of the capture.

 

 

 


If you are doing a continuous acquisition using normal DAQ devices, the T0 starts when we start the acquisition and updates with each fetch from the running task.

 

I want to call that a bug in the modular instruments drivers for LabVIEW.

 

Stated clearly;

 

"T0 of waveforms from modular instruments are never updated."

 

Let's see if NI can CAR this issue.

 

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 42 of 44
(297 Views)

You might add "when Timestamp Type is set to relative", because it works when set to absolute.

========================
=== Engineer Ambiguously ===
========================
Message 43 of 44
(286 Views)

@RTSLVU wrote:

You might add "when Timestamp Type is set to relative", because it works when set to absolute.


I wonder if that is what tripped me up all those long years ago.

 

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
0 Kudos
Message 44 of 44
(283 Views)