From 04:00 PM CDT – 08:00 PM CDT (09:00 PM UTC – 01:00 AM UTC) Tuesday, April 16, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Mean PtByPt VI stops working

Hello,

 

currently I'm creating a VI for reading out a multimeter.

In this application I need in parallel a measurement about the last 3s and 30s while tool is continueing and for this I want to use the VI "Mean PtByPt".

Every 25ms I get a new value, so I have a sample length of 120 and 1200.

120 samples are ok, but 1200 seems to stop sporadically  and after a few seconds it keeps going on.

Do you have an idea for this issue?

 

Thanks

 

Stefan

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 6
(1,372 Views)

@Stefan_shs wrote:

Hello,

 

currently I'm creating a VI for reading out a multimeter.

In this application I need in parallel a measurement about the last 3s and 30s while tool is continueing and for this I want to use the VI "Mean PtByPt".

Every 25ms I get a new value, so I have a sample length of 120 and 1200.

120 samples are ok, but 1200 seems to stop sporadically  and after a few seconds it keeps going on.

Do you have an idea for this issue?

 

Thanks

 

Stefan

 


Sorry my post wasn't helpful.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 6
(1,370 Views)

Hi Stefan,

 

the problem with images is: we cannot debug them using LabVIEW.

 

So I created a simple test VI:

As this one works as expected (i.e. nothing "stops suddenly") I guess the problem is in other stuff of your VI next to the PtByPt-Mean functions.

 

Recommendation: Debug your VI…

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 6
(1,358 Views)

Hello Gerd,

 

thanks for answering so fast.

Now I added the VI 😉 - sorry

I will try your vi-test.

 

best regards

Stefan

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 6
(1,335 Views)

Hi Stefan,

 

I simplified your VI to run the test without any file handling:

No need to build up an ever-growing array just to calculate a min/max value.

Are you sure by adding current values you get the "average voltage"???

I also added a wait time to the loop…

 

Please run such a test to verify your observations!

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 6
(1,329 Views)

Hi Gerd,

 

the simply test was successfully without any abnormalities except there seems to be a small difference between LV2013 and LV2018, but that is to neglect, I think.

At the moment I'm working with 2013.

 

And the theme with the average voltage:

The documentation is not so fine till now. I measure a voltage value from a current transducer, add all values and divide them by the index. And the factor to get the current is 60. 

 

And I will insert a wait time - so I get a defined time for the samples by the mean currents.

 

Thanks

 

Best regards 

Stefan

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 6
(1,239 Views)