From 04:00 PM CDT – 08:00 PM CDT (09:00 PM UTC – 01:00 AM UTC) Tuesday, April 16, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Labview any good ?

Hi All,

I used to write ATE s/w 10 years ago in HP-Basic and a bit VB,
my present company needs some ATE now and as I "already know
all about it" 🙂 I got the job.

I feel well out of touch and would be grateful if people could give me
a option on Labview as the way to go is it good bad or wha t or VB
better
CVI or maybe HT-Basic.

Initially I am looking at GPIB equipemt testing RF blocks, want
database
access for results and some form of scripting to apply over the top.

Any comment would be welcome

Danny Thomson
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(2,501 Views)
Danny Thomson wrote:

> I used to write ATE s/w 10 years ago in HP-Basic and a bit VB,
> my present company needs some ATE now and as I "already know
> all about it" 🙂 I got the job.
>
> I feel well out of touch and would be grateful if people could give me
> a option on Labview as the way to go is it good bad or wha t or VB
> better CVI or maybe HT-Basic.
>
> Initially I am looking at GPIB equipemt testing RF blocks, want
> database access for results and some form of scripting to apply over the
> top.

I'm in a similar position, getting back into test equipment programming,
but my task is to instrument drivers in LabView, CVI, VEE and anything
else our customers want.

In my limited experience (about 2 weeks) I have found HPVEE to be much
easier to use.
The wires move automatically. LabVIEW wires are very
cumbersome by comparison. I spend a lot more time messing with LabVIEW
wires, and almost no time with HPVEE wires. Also, HPVEE has two KINDS of
wires, data flow and control flow, which I think makes the block diagram
more clear.

Just my 2 cents, and worth every penny....

Mike
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(2,501 Views)
The downside of hpvee is that it executes more slowly (in my brief exposure),
has a fraction of the LabVIEW users, doesn't have nearly the number of add
ons, and about the only instrument manufacturer that makes hpvee drivers
is Agilent.

Mike Tranchemontagne wrote:
>Danny Thomson wrote:>>> I used to write ATE s/w 10 years ago in HP-Basic
and a bit VB,>> my present company needs some ATE now and as I "already know>>
all about it" 🙂 I got the job.>>>> I feel well out of touch and would be
grateful if people could give me>> a option on Labview as the way to go is
it good bad or wha t or VB>> better CVI or maybe HT-Basic.>>>> Initially
I am looking at GPIB equipemt testing RF blocks, want>> database access
for results and some form
of scripting to apply over the>> top.>>I'm in a
similar position, getting back into test equipment programming,>but my task
is to instrument drivers in LabView, CVI, VEE and anything>else our customers
want.>>In my limited experience (about 2 weeks) I have found HPVEE to be
much>easier to use. The wires move automatically. LabVIEW wires are very>cumbersome
by comparison. I spend a lot more time messing with LabVIEW>wires, and almost
no time with HPVEE wires. Also, HPVEE has two KINDS of>wires, data flow
and control flow, which I think makes the block diagram>more clear.>>Just
my 2 cents, and worth every penny....>>Mike>
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(2,501 Views)