How to build an array dynamically based on content of another array?

[hus_505]

Hi everyone ,

Let's say i have a boolean array of 6 rows (Input array) . I want to dynamically build another array (output array) that contains the indecies of the zeros/Falses in the input array. I made a block diagram for you to understand what i mean.

[thols · Accepted solution]

[hus_505]

Thanks ! . The problem is , i am using an old LabView that doesnt have tunnel mode ? How would it be like without the tunnel mode ?

[wiebe@CARYA]

[hus_505]

I don't understand, where the output array is .

Also , what happens in the false case ?

[wiebe@CARYA · Accepted solution]

---

@hus_505 wrote:

I don't understand, where the output array is .

Also , what happens in the false case ?

---

The shift register output is the output array.

In the false case, the array is wired form left to right.

Are you aware of the (free) courses?

[altenbach]

---

@hus_505 wrote:

I don't understand, where the output array is .

Also , what happens in the false case ?

---

I don't understand either, because the output does not contain any indices as requested: 😮

Here's the correct solution (not using a conditional tunnel, i.e. for ancient LabVIEW versions only).

[wiebe@CARYA]

---

@altenbach wrote:

---

@hus_505 wrote:

I don't understand, where the output array is .

Also , what happens in the false case ?

---

I don't understand either, because the output does not contain any indices as requested: 😮

Here's the correct solution (not using a conditional tunnel, i.e. for ancient LabVIEW versions only).

---

🌴😐 (:palmface:)

Should have run it at least once.

[altenbach]

---

wiebe@CARYA wrote:
🌴😐 (:palmface:)

Should have run it at least once.

---

"Once" is statistically irrelevant. 😄

(What bothered me more about your snippet is that the integers are a much lighter blue. Why is that?)

[wiebe@CARYA]

---

@altenbach wrote:

---

wiebe@CARYA wrote:
🌴😐 (:palmface:)

Should have run it at least once.

---

"Once" is statistically irrelevant. 😄

---

But inf times more then none 😊

---

@altenbach wrote:

(What bothered me more about your snippet is that the integers are a much lighter blue. Why is that?)

---

At some point I was curious what "ModernBD=True" did.

I didn't hate it so much that I turned it off, or maybe I figured it gave me a head start getting used to NXG look.