# LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for
Did you mean:

Solved!
Go to solution

## Easier way to do this math

if(phase > 180.0F) phase = phase-360.0F;
if(phase < -180.0F) phase = 360.0F+phase;
Phase= phase;

I keep ending up with a nested case structure, or serialized case structures, or serialized selects when trying to do the above math. Is there any way I can calculate phase in a more concise statement?

Message 1 of 5
(859 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author GregFreeman
08-27-2015 04:09 PM

## Re: Easier way to do this math

To wrap the phase I would add 180, divide by 360 with Q&R, subtract 180 from the remainder.

Message 2 of 5
(849 Views)

## Re: Easier way to do this math

Or use LabVIEW's 'wrap angle' VI.

Message 3 of 5
(844 Views)

## Re: Easier way to do this math

If you know that the input phase is going to be within some reasonable range like (-10 000, +10 000), then just do

A = value + 180 + N*360

B = A modulo 360

output = B - 180

with N large enough that it encompasses the bottom end of the range but not so large that it plus the top of the range will risk overflow.

If the range is too big for that or you really know nothing about the range (in which case even your nested cases wouldn't work), then you can do

A = value + 180

B = A modulo 360 (B is in -359.9999...359.9999)

C = B + 360 (C is in +eps...719.99999)

E = D modulo 360 (D value is in 0....359.999999)

F = D - 180

Taking a second modulo may be faster than adding in a comparison because then there's no branching, and branching is expensive, and you'll need two of them, but only one extra modulo.

... or, umm, the wrap angle vi. Yeah, that would work.

Message 4 of 5
(842 Views)

## Re: Easier way to do this math

It's a mechanical system so actuators phase is limited

Message 5 of 5
(833 Views)