02-18-2010 07:04 AM
02-18-2010 07:18 AM
02-18-2010 07:29 AM
02-18-2010 07:39 AM
Thanks for reply...I will try the example...To add more I was thinking that....is this possible to divide single screen into 3 or 4 parts(or blocks) and having enable button for each part..so when user select that button that part change color(look active) and all other becomes gray or unusable(look inactive....)
is it possible??
02-18-2010 07:52 AM
MSD100 wrote:Thanks for reply...I will try the example...To add more I was thinking that....is this possible to divide single screen into 3 or 4 parts(or blocks) and having enable button for each part..so when user select that button that part change color(look active) and all other becomes gray or unusable(look inactive....)
is it possible??
Iagree with using Tabs.
To achieve the latter part of you last reply, there is nothing that prevents you from using more than one TAB control. You can hide the page label display to improve cosmetics. At the bottom, you can have a row of buttons outside the TAB control(s) to do whatever you please..
All is possible.. It's usually a matter of time & money 😉 😄
02-18-2010 08:01 AM
02-18-2010 08:12 AM
Ray.R wrote:
MSD100 wrote:Thanks for reply...I will try the example...To add more I was thinking that....is this possible to divide single screen into 3 or 4 parts(or blocks) and having enable button for each part..so when user select that button that part change color(look active) and all other becomes gray or unusable(look inactive....)
is it possible??
Iagree with using Tabs.
To achieve the latter part of you last reply, there is nothing that prevents you from using more than one TAB control. You can hide the page label display to improve cosmetics. At the bottom, you can have a row of buttons outside the TAB control(s) to do whatever you please..
All is possible.. It's usually a matter of time & money 😉 😄
Tabs are the simplest solution provided you can define at development time all of the possible screens. The difference in the amount of effort to use tabs vs the other techniques available is so large that it is often prudent to placve restriction on your design in order to use teh tab control.
So....
Check out the tab control and think about how you can adapt it to your needs.
If the tab falls short post back explaining why and if we still can't help, we'll offer other solutions*.
Ben
* The "other solutions" require additional work that ranges from tedious to mind-boggling.
02-18-2010 12:22 PM - edited 02-18-2010 12:23 PM
I was thinking about the mind-boggling solution, but how do you describe that in this forum to someone who has never done it that way. And take less than 5 (or 10) minutes to fully explain it...???...
>>> TABs <<<
Not as scalable, but it will do should the trick.. 😉
Which one's the tedious?
Or is your tedious my mind boggling? 😮
02-18-2010 12:43 PM
Tedious:
Hidden control positioned and shown (like we had to do before the Tab control was available)
Mind-bogling:
Render all uisng a picture control and write all supporting mouse-down/click code yourself (I have written this in LVOOP and should not have to ever re-write this again... unless...)
Ben
02-18-2010 02:00 PM