From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.
We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.
From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.
We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.
06-15-2009 04:53 PM - edited 06-15-2009 04:54 PM
One of my favorite features of LabVIEW 8.6 is Linked Tunnels. I can't believe I haven't written a nugget about these yet! In case you haven't heard, wiring tunnels in multi-frame structures is a lot easier in LabVIEW 8.6:
See those tiny white triangles on outer edges of the string tunnels? Those indicate the input/output tunnels are "linked". There are two equally awesome use cases for linked tunnels:
06-15-2009 05:28 PM
06-15-2009 05:30 PM
06-16-2009 05:23 AM
06-16-2009 07:04 AM
Way cool! I use "action engine" functional globals all the time, and these are always growing in their case structures, each time I added a case I had to wire up all tunnels through from my shift registers (typically 2-3 wires), or duplicate a default case and alter it. This takes 10-20 seconds but I do it several times a day. Now I will be able to save a minute or two a day, at the end of my career I can probably retire a few days early now. Thanks.
06-16-2009 07:26 AM
Fantastic!
This is a great feature that I was not aware of. Thanks Darren. 🙂
Using this feature when creating State Machines or Event Structures will be very useful and highly appreciated.
You should definitely show this during NI Week. This is a feature that has been long awaited.... (by me)
RayR
06-16-2009 07:58 AM
I am a fan of the linked tunnels myself.
Q: What happens to a linked tunnel when a LV 8.6 VI is back saved to LV 8.5 where that option was not available? I did not notice any warning message when I back-saved.
Curious,
Ben
06-16-2009 10:51 AM
Ben wrote:Q: What happens to a linked tunnel when a LV 8.6 VI is back saved to LV 8.5 where that option was not available? I did not notice any warning message when I back-saved.
When you save for previous an 8.6 VI with linked tunnels, the links simply disappear in the previous version. I think we only display warnings during Save for Previous if the resulting VI will be broken, or risks having changed runtime functionality. In the case of these tunnels, there's no risk of that kind of thing happening in 8.5 and earlier if you remove the links.