LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Baseline determination and subtraction

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi everyone - I need some help in figuring out how best to do a baseline determination then subtract it out leaving just the peaks.  My data is profilometry measurements across a substrate surface.  As you can see in the chart below the substrate surface is fairly straight but not lying flat on the scanner table.  I am looking for an easy method to identify the linear baseline then subtract it from the raw data thus leaving the four peaks with essentially a zero/horizontal)baseline.  Then I can use the Peak Detector to identify the peaks and their locations so I can make additional calculations (mostly peak area and average peak height).

 

Any suggestions on how to best go about this? 

Message 1 of 13
(8,291 Views)

Your baseline does not look linear, you probably need at least quadratic polynomial (or higher).

 

So just select all the non-peak values and fit them to a polynomial, then subtract the polynomial. Can you attach some typical data file?

Message 2 of 13
(8,275 Views)

Can you apply a High-Pass filter with a relatively low filter frequency to remove the nearly-linear baseline component. That ought to leave you with a nearly flat dataset.

Thoric (CLA, CLED, CTD and LabVIEW Champion)


Message 3 of 13
(8,244 Views)
Spoiler
 

Attached is a sample scan of data and my first attempt at applying a filtering routine.  I don't think I'm usign this correctly becuase I cannot seem to flatten out the baseline without gross distortion of the peaks.

 

Can either suggest where I'm going wrong here?

Download All
Message 4 of 13
(8,231 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author MJHanagan

A polynomial fit using "least absolute residual" is relatively insensitive to outliers and seems to work pretty well in this particular case.

 

See if this works for you.

 

Download All
Message 5 of 13
(8,217 Views)

Wow, this is nothing short of awesome!  I have no idea what this small tight routine does, but it certainly seems to have solved my problem perfectly.  It's an elegant solution.  You must be a mathematician or a physicist.  Thank you!!

Message 6 of 13
(8,212 Views)

Sorry, there was a bit of duplicate code. Some of the "complex to RE/IM" can be eliminated, of course.

 

Message 7 of 13
(8,207 Views)

This is an interesting topic to me, I would like to correct a baseline to zero for some data so that later I can determine the area of just the peak, and not the peak and its baseline.  I have entered the data into altenbach's block diagram (thanks!) well enough to see the raw data (scan data) but the front panel doesnt return anything for baseline or baseline corrected.  I will try to decipher what could be wrong on my end but am also submitting for anyone's consideration, thanks so much.  Pic attached.

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 13
(8,120 Views)

Instead of attaching an image, attach your actual VI and some data.

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 13
(8,108 Views)

Yes, lets see if the servers like this size of a data file.  I had it as an .lvm but changed it to a txt file or it wouldnt upload...

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 10 of 13
(8,095 Views)