11-06-2006 05:00 PM
11-07-2006 06:59 AM
hi there
is it possible just to pass the envelope to the "Exponential Fit.vi" to get the damping of the curve?
11-07-2006 07:24 AM
11-07-2006 07:53 AM
Thank you Chris,
you gave me
the right idea. I didn’t think about it, cos I had already a finished formula. I
just thought maybe here I could find a way to get to my points and as it seems
I did in a different way however. Thanks.
Its not necessary
to know the peaks its much better to know the envelope.
From the
envelope I select two points. The difference in my x-value is my time
difference and I generate the quotient of the y values.
The damping
rate is then the natural logarithm of this quotient divided through the time
difference.
This applyes to all vibrations which are viscous damped.
11-07-2006 09:17 AM
hi there
please take a look at the attachment. the example uses the "Exponential Fit.vi" to get the damping factor. the fit will lead to a more reliable value than just two data points. the example uses only a subset of the data.
11-09-2006 11:37 PM
06-16-2009 10:05 PM
Hello:
In this example, what does fArray mean? How I will determine it?
thanks
AK
06-17-2009 09:35 AM
laplace transform wrote:Hello:
In this example, what does fArray mean? How I will determine it?
thanks
AK
Where in the code are you referring to?
11-04-2009 10:16 AM
Dear Chrisger,
I tried with your example in the second post of this thread. But not able to get a clear envelope. Can anybody tell me what is the value to be given for "new value for dt" in the block diagram? Is it always constant 0.02?
I attached my waveform and the result.
Mathan
11-05-2009 03:15 PM
Mathan,
I cant help with your hilbert transform question.
However, I have taken a very simple approach to get the upper and lower envelopes. I take an interval, say every 50 points, and find the max and min in that interval. This gives the envelopes in XY format as the timestamps are non-uniform. I extracted the first 2500 points from your example data.
I realise this might not be ideal because you may want to stay in waveform format. I hope this is better than nothing at this point.
David