Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

- « Previous
- Next »

10-09-2015 06:01 PM

Options

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report to a Moderator

Dear Altenbach,

Here's the file of the two phantoms.

Tq

06-05-2018 03:27 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report to a Moderator

Can the model be adapted to fit a superellipse?

I am using a similar model to get x_c, y_c, a, b, and rotation.

For an ellipse, the equation always has a 2 for the exponent.

In my case, I need to be able the adjust the 2 up or down slightly to fit the curve more accurately. All of my points (typically a count of 8) are on the perimeter.

06-05-2018 03:57 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report to a Moderator

@buckeyedave wrote:

Can the model be adapted to fit a superellipse?

A non-linear fit is a non-linear fit, so the answer is "Of course, but ...". Gauss (of curve-fitting fame) is reputed to have said (in German, almost certainly) "With 5 parameters, I can fit an elephant; with 6, I can make him wave his trunk" (I, myself, don't really believe Gauss said this, but it illustrates that if you add enough parameters, you can exactly fit almost anything).

Your model will have 6 parameters, and you are fitting 8 points, which may or may not be "well-placed" to allow a meaningful distinction between nearby choices of parameters (to say nothing about the possibility that there may be a little "noise" in the points, themselves). Have you ever heard of Sensitivity Analysis?

Bob Schor

- « Previous
- Next »