LabVIEW Idea Exchange

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JDinkins

Split Number/Join Numbers primitive connector placement

Status: New

Re-opening because of a request to reconsider this functionality for LabVIEW now that LabVIEW NXG has been discontinued.

The connectors hi(x) & lo(x) on the primitives for "Split Number" & "Join Numbers" do not line up with multi-connector primitives (Index Array, Build Array, Format, Format into String, Scan from String, etc). See below:

 

 Idea Exchange - JoinSplit Number Alignment.jpg

14 Comments
BVSmith
Member

With respect, this forum is called the "LabVIEW Idea Exchange", so this hasn't been completed in LabVIEW.

Hopefully, LabVIEW isn't being abandoned because of NXG.

Brian Smith
Advanced Light Source
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Darren
Proven Zealot

We have marked ideas as 'Completed' with multiple possible outcomes:

 

- Implemented in LabVIEW

- Implemented in LabVIEW NXG

- Implemented in both LabVIEW and LabVIEW NXG

 

If something is marked as 'Complete' in LabVIEW NXG only, NI has specifically decided not to invest resources in implementing that idea in LabVIEW as well.

AristosQueue (NI)
NI Employee (retired)

Both LabVIEW 20xx and LabVIEW NXG are LabVIEW. LabVIEW NXG exists specifically to address shortcomings of LabVIEW 20xx. LabVIEW 20xx is still in development, still gaining new features, but LabVIEW NXG is gaining faster and will eventually eclipse LabVIEW 20xx, at which point the LabVIEW 20xx line will be retired. That point is still several years away.

Christina_R
Active Participant
Status changed to: New

Re-opening because of a request to reconsider this functionality for LabVIEW now that LabVIEW NXG has been discontinued.


Christina Rogers
Principal Product Owner, LabVIEW R&D