Split Number/Join Numbers primitive connector placement

[JDinkins]

The connectors hi(x) & lo(x) on the primitives for "Split Number" & "Join Numbers" do not line up with multi-connector primitives (Index Array, Build Array, Format, Format into String, Scan from String, etc). See below:

 

[GregSands]

Yes, all those small things bug me too!   I usually end up hiding the bend under one of the primatives, but fixing it is preferable.

[TiTou]

yep, and while you're at it, do the same for variant (i think there is already in idea for that) and "to more specific class"

[David_L]

Good call.  While not a duplicate, you can definitely file this one with Change error terminals of Variant to Data function to match every other VI and Function in LabVIEW

[crossrulz]

It's always the small things that annoy you the most.  This is one of those for me.

[stbe]

There's also the "To More Specific Class" that doesn't really fit to property and invoke nodes ...

[JackDunaway]

Check out the other thread David_L links to above. I'll paste three snapshots from that link:

[Guy Drew]

Nice and simple

[vitoi]

Build Array is correct with 8 pixels of separation. Split Number has 9 pixels of separation, so should be the one to change. Having everything on 8 pixel seperation makes things nice when wiring. (It's also the separation on a standard 4:2:2:4 subVI icon.)

[Darren]

Available in LabVIEW NXG 1.0. All node terminal positions should be positioned in increments of 5 pixels, so wiring one node to another should result in wires with no bends, or bends of 5, 10, 15, etc. pixels.