From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.
We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.
I don't know how many times I've added a case statement post-programming, but I do know that there isn't an easy way to make a tunnel the case selector. Usually I delete the tunnel and then drag the case selector down and then rewire, there should be an easier way. For loops and while loops have an easy way to index/unindex or replace with shift register, why can't a case statement be the same?
Eximo, what you are proposing is actually a different idea and should be submitted separately. But do a search first. There are all ready several ideas along the lines of "multiple case selectors". Honestly, I don't see what you are proposing in your lower left idea as being a real improvement over the upper right picture.
Now that this is implemente, what about the reverse action: disconnecting the Case Selector from an incoming wire while letting the wire go through (thus becoming a tunnel)?
The Case Selector could be pushed aside or just left where it is (with the risk of confusion).
X, just choose something else to be the case selector. It will be the same amount of effort for you.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines "Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
BVSmith, the first option is what you are looking for. "Replace with Case Selector"
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines "Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Implemented in LabVIEW 2014