Data Acquisition Idea Exchange

Community Browser
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Post an idea

Texas Instruments makes a superb line of 16-bit Sigma-Delta ADCs with sampling rates up to 10MHz: ADS 1610, ADS 1602, etc.

See  http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ads1610.pdf

They sell for about $25 each in modest quantities.

 

Using these converters would provide much better fidelity than any available products as there is no need for external analog antialiasing filters. 

 

I'll place my order now. I personally need 1,2,4,8 AIs and 1,2 AOs with same sampling frequencies from same clock. I don't need all those digital I/Os and quadrature decoders.

 

Just give me analog I/O with sigma-delta converters.  When can I place an order?

 

 

 

Hi everyone, I have new project of measuring pressure and temperature, the problem here is I must put everything in a box with IP 65 (High safety) and the data will be logged about 5 minutes of period, after each week I will take the data and load to computer. Can I using NI product to do it? is there any NI products with large memory inside for storage?

I've been told that in order to change module settings, you have to connect a development machine to the network has has the cRIO hardware. Most systems I build have a deployed application and are located somewhere else (i.e. no connected to my machine). It'd be nice if the cRIO module setting could be ported to the cRIO unit without having to connect a development machine and hit "connect" in the project.

 

For example, I had a cRIO unit in my office and set it up for a project. They installed it, wired it, and tested it. A few months later we needed to add a NI 9213 (16 ch Thermocouple module). It defaults to type J and degree Celcius. In order to switch it to type K, I had to bring my desktop out to the unit, connect to the network, and redeploy the cRIO. I called support twice and was told this is the only way to deploy the module settings. If i'm wrong, someone please correct me.

 

 

I'm thinking it could be another type of application builder or something you could add to an existing application.

 

 

For test systems that use several daq devices and need to associate them with specific hardware tasks in a LabVIEW program, it is desirable to allow the user to specify which daq device is to be used with a certain function in the program.  For example Dev1 may perform sensor measurements, Dev2 may perform control tasks.  There can also be situations where the same type of task is performed more than once in the program by more than one daq device, again requiring that the specific daq device be associated with the specific task.  The serial embedded number can be read from the daq hardware and displayed to the user for them to choose and match with the appropriate task.  It would be easier and less error prone if there was a way to program (via MAX ?) a custom serial number/name into the daq hardware (in addition to the NI supplied one) that could then be read and shown to the user.

 

Steve

 

I need to computer 16 ADC lines simultaneously. 9239 is great except when I use 4 of them, each start with a random delay. Also after about minutes, they start drifting and the phase shift is very obvious.

 

My signals have to be isolated from each other and the USB port.  It would be ideal to have them connected through a second port or the DB9 which already exist so that they share the same synch signal and clock. Once one of them starts, it kick start the rest.

 

Thanks,

Omid

I think it would be nice if NI could develop a digitizer to be able to perform USB 3.0 compliance tests, as well as potentially support PCIe tests as it's a pretty similar physical layer.  I'll just go ahead and buy the LeCroy or Agilent solution instead for $100k+.  

Not sure if this is the ideal place for this suggestion (maybe MAX suggestions?), but here goes...

 

When dealing with various remotely deployed cRIO hardware configurations, it may be impossible to keep a sample configuration of every type of system we ever sell.  Unfortunately, if upgrades or revisions are made to the base code in our system, remotely deploying to our customers becomes impossible unless we have their exact configuration on-hand for the programmers to compile.  Remote connection to the hardware for this type of operation is also not typically possible.

 

To be able to simulate or emulate a full cRIO system (processor & hardware modules), then compile the RT code for deployment on that system as if it is physically connected to our development system would be ideal.  This would allow images to be created, which can be sent to customers for local deployment at their facility.  Dramatic decrease in "hardware library" requirements on the development end, reduction in "on-site upgrade" service trip costs to the customers.  Plus, easier for OEMs like me to justify the move away from PLC types of hardware and towards cRIO, once you take away some of the potentially nightmarish continued support and update issues involved with basing systems on cRIO platforms.

In the case of a power failure on a cRIO or cDAQ having a C Series module which could provide back up power would be helpful.

 

We can use this to:

  • Keep the system clock going on cRIOs that do not have an internal battery
  • Take time stamp of the crash
  • Grab the last known value of shared variables and store them for the reset
  • Perform any shutdown operations that are nessecary

 

I am trying to synchronise the differential data acquisition NIDAQmx of a PCI 6031E board (2 channels AI0 and AI8) with an ASIC delivering two outputs (e.g. 3.54volts and 3.53 volts). 

 

I want to read the difference between those 2 outputs from the ASIC in the NICARD.

 

First I am trying to find out what my connections should be like regarding AIGND, DGND and the GND of my circuit ASIC:

 

http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3344

 

I am using HARDWARE timing acquisition on NIDAQmx and an ATMEGA128 to deliver a CLOCK to the NICARD and deliver a waveform to the ASIC which makes it send me the data to the NICARD on every CLOCK high.

 

I attach two sketches of the system IDEA and system connections.

 

Thanks.

 

Javi.

 

 

If the 5 volt output power terminal were available as an Internal Channel in DAQmx, then its actual value could be measured.  That would allow accurate use of it as the power source for example for external bridge or voltage divider measurements which rely on knowledge of that voltage.  On the X Series USB-6343 for example, that terminal is on pin 96.

Some of our competitors provide a module that can measure low frequencies (typically for water meters) with no needed excitation voltage. It would be great to see a Compact FieldPoint module with similar capabilities 🙂

There are a few different versions of the NI USB 9211 Thermocouple Module.  The USB 9211 is now a legacy device and the USB 9211A is the upgraded version for higher performance.  The issue that I have seen when using the USB 9211A for Mac is that the DAQmx Base drivers that support the USB 9211 are different than the drivers that support the 9211A, but the device itself does not specify which version of the 9211 the customer has. DAQmx Base 2.1 supports the 9211 and DAQmx Base 3.2 supports the 9211A, but the device will not be recognized if the incorrect driver is downloaded.

 

My suggestion would be to print the "A" after the 9211 on the new devices to make sure that the customer knows which driver to download for their device.

We have a need to a DAQ card that can handle more than 10V.  I know there's an SC module that does 300V, but antenuation by 30 in signal conditioning seems a bit much.  In retrospect, Agilent has a 100V input PXI card without the signal conditioning (32 Channels, 16-bit, 250kS/s).

 Does NI notice that the R&D requirement of MEMS sensors with "atto scale capacitance or inductance change?" In the past years, we can only achieve the measurements by MS3110 or Agilent E4980A. But they are not easy to be integrated with other equipments. The operiating or measurement frequency of the sensors, for example MEMS microphone, accelerometer, gyroscope, tactile sensor, is usually DC~100kHz, with aF or aH capacitance or inductance change.

 

MS3110

http://www.irvine-sensors.com/Chips&Modules.html 

 

On the other hand, which relay type of switch/multiplex/matrix card is proper for the MS3110 or Agilent E4980A with lower capacitance or inductance?

Based on this LabVIEW Idea...

 

Support the iPad as an execution target

 

Adding this type of support would allow NI and others to develop applications similar to the Oscium oscope using NI DAQ hardware.

 

I recently had a customer offer the suggestion to expand the support for the USB-8451 to include a coding environment that includes .NET. Currently the only supported development environments are:

 

LabVIEW™ 8.5, 8.6, LabVIEW 2009 (32-bit), and LabVIEW 2010 (32-bit)
LabWindows™/CVI™ 8.0 (or newer)
Microsoft Visual C/C++ 6.0

 

I just wanted to share this with the community.

I am not an electircal engineer, so I have no idea if there is some reason this has not been implemented in exiting versions of teh cDAQ chassis.  But there are a whole host of applications where a user wants to do Hardware timed digital output to different channels using DIFFERENT time bases.  It would be nice to have more than one DO timing engine available.  I would love to see that in future versions of the cDAQ chassis.

 

Thanks

Matt

If NI already has the product, please let me know. I need it in my project. If otherwise, I would like to suggest NI to develope one based its NI-9234 and WLS-9163. It can be readily developed by just remove three channels of the NI-9234 and make a smaller version of WLS-9163 for one channel. I would like the product be one unit to achieve a small size. The one channel wireless data aquisition module will have two imporatnt advantages: 1) much smaller size, therefore can be fit into difficult locations; 2) much lower power consumption, therefore can make much longer recording. These two advantages are essential for wireless measurement, thus the product will have good market potential.

This question goes for usb-6008 and 9

 

From the User Guide and Specs:

"The progammable-gain amplifier provides input gains of 1, 2, 4, 5, 8,
10, 16, or 20 when configured for differential measurements and gain
of 1 when configured for single-ended measurements"

 

Why can't I use the PGA in single-ended modes?

 

best

Niels

NI USB-4432 has 5 input,But only There are 4 channels with software-selectable IEPE signal conditioning (0 or 2.1 mA).

 

 

Make NI USB-4433  5 channels with software-selectable IEPE signal conditioning (0 or 2.1 mA).