Data Acquisition Idea Exchange

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SSI (synchronous serial interface) Bus Module or card

Status: New

NI supports almost any bus.  Why not SSI (synchronous serial interface) ?  

 

Of course, there is always the option to use an R series card and then build an interface.  Why not have a low-cost PCI or USB card? Also, perhaps a C-series module, so that we don't have to take up FPGA space?

4 Comments
John_P1
Trusted Enthusiast

To implement an SSI master, you essentially just need a way to synchronize a digital input to an exported clock and chip-select line.  This shouldn't be too difficult to implement using an M/X series DAQ device (example here).  C Series modules that support clocked DIO can run the same DAQmx code if used in a cDAQ chassis.  This might not fit everybody's definition of "low cost" but it should be less expensive than the R Series/cRIO route.

 

Maybe it would be a good starting point for NI to simply provide a more formal SSI DAQmx example/library.

John Passiak
A-T-R
Member

Just for the records:

 

http://www.addi-data.biz/index.php/component/hikashop/product/6-apci-1710-multifunction-counter-boar...

 

 

 

There are also SSI-LV-Examples available, but it's just not "native"...

 

http://www.addi-data.com/treiber/apci1710/32bit/Labview/ssi_l.exe

 

Peter-daq.io
Member

Even though I don't get commission, I would like to advertise Noffz' (German Platinum Alliance member) solution - It was designed to test SSI connected sensors: 

 

Noffz cRIO 4422 module - it supports differential RS-422 and more specifically SSI. From their web site: 

  • 4-channel differential digital output
  • 4-channel differential digital input
  • RS422 common mode -7V to +12V
  • Single ended TTL mode possible
  • Input delay time 46ns typ.
  • Output delay time 35ns typ.

 

Peter 

 

 

 

 

CLD | Alliance Partner | Web data storage and visualization | daq.io
User002
Not applicable