DQMH Feature Requests

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Move Reply bundle, for Request and wait for reply events, in Wait for reply case structure

Status: New

Thanks for adding this request. 

 

There is an issue with implementing this request. When you select a "Round Trip" event, it creates a "Request and Wait for Reply" and the Broadcast. The Broadcast uses as arguments the Reply. The Broadcast is called whether the wait for Reply is true or not. 

 

Let's see what others have to say, but I am feeling inclined at the moment to decline this request.

 

Thanks,

Fab

When you add a new Request and wait for reply event, the scripting tool adds automatically, in the Modules consumer, the handler case. In this case, there is also added the bundle for the Reply message and the Wait for reply? case structure. 

Personally, i move every time the bundle inside the Wait for reply? case structure to have a cleaner area.

The scripting tool can add this automatically for a cleaner view and maybe an optimized code. There is no need to create a bundle, if you do not use it forward.

 

Download All
1 Comment
Active Participant
Status changed to: New

Thanks for adding this request. 

 

There is an issue with implementing this request. When you select a "Round Trip" event, it creates a "Request and Wait for Reply" and the Broadcast. The Broadcast uses as arguments the Reply. The Broadcast is called whether the wait for Reply is true or not. 

 

Let's see what others have to say, but I am feeling inclined at the moment to decline this request.

 

Thanks,

Fab

I'm Organizing the GLA Summit!


For an opportunity to learn from experienced developers / entrepeneurs (Steve, Joerg, and Brian amongst them):
Check out DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshop!

DQMH Lead Architect * DQMH Trusted Advisor * Certified LabVIEW Architect * Certified LabVIEW Embedded Developer * Certified Professional Instructor * LabVIEW Champion * Code Janitor

Have you been nice to future you?