DQMH Feature Requests

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Create xUnit style result for Headless Validation

Status: New

For the Validate Module\Validate DQMH Module (Headless).vi, consider formatting the Validation Results in xUnit format. 


An opportunity to learn from experienced developers / entrepreneurs (Fab, Steve and Brian amongst them):
DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshops
Automate the analyzing, testing, documenting, building, packaging and publishing of your projects via CI/CD:
Release Automation Tools for LabVIEW

2 Comments
Active Participant

After looking into the whole topic some more and discussing with other people, I do think that the DQMH Module Validation produces a code quality metric rather than a test metric.

 

Seeing as we use GitLab, I'd like to suggest for the validation tool to create reports in Code Climate syntax. See GitLab Code Quality - Implementing a custom tool for more details on that syntax.


An opportunity to learn from experienced developers / entrepreneurs (Fab, Steve and Brian amongst them):
DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshops
Automate the analyzing, testing, documenting, building, packaging and publishing of your projects via CI/CD:
Release Automation Tools for LabVIEW

Active Participant

For the record. You can glance at it --> https://felipekb.com/2020/09/28/vi-analyzer-and-gitlab-code-quality/

 

That's an implementation of links shared by Joerg.

Olivier JOURDAN

Wovalab | Certified LabVIEW Architect | DQMH Trusted Advisor |