DQMH Consortium Toolkits Discussions

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Simplifying your Hardware Abstraction Layer with LVOOP and DQMH – Part I

Hi,

 

Anybody familiar with the attached presentatio and if so do you have Part 2 and the zip files you can share? (I'm asking this here, because at the end of the document the author says that part2 will be a DQMH implementation, so I assume this is somewhat DQMH related.)

 

I programmed a HAL before which was very similar (I think it was coming from a presentation I found here: https://dqmh.org/hal-in-your-dqmh-2/), but so far dont really buy the idea of separating the class hierarchy to different files. I dont see how is this any better than having just one project for the class, cause the parent classes are always there as dependencies. On the other hand this - at least seemingly - adds fair amount of complexity cause now I dont have my classes in one file, plus if I need to add more methods then I need to edit different project files. 


Wondering about your thoughts on this.

Thx

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(266 Views)

The original post was postet by Chris Roebuck here. You can find the zip-file there.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(234 Views)

@Ludwig72 wrote:

The original post was postet by Chris Roebuck here. You can find the zip-file there.


The content of the PDF I attached is not the same as what ChrisR presented. The general concept is, but the key difference (and this is why I dont get it) that in the PDF the author put the classes to different files. The inheritence is the same, but implementation is not.

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(221 Views)