Yes, the DQMH 5.0 Validation tool adds the DQMH Module name which is redundant because the VI already has the Module Name inside of the code.
We added this as a placeholder for a much better feature that will come later: including in the error reporting where the error originated. We didn't get to that feature in time for DQMH 5.0 release. We discussed removing the validate/fixer but opted for leaving it there. When the new feature comes, we will use the module name as a guideline to where to make the replacement via scripting.