As K_Bull noted in the feature request document here:
https://forums.ni.com/t5/Delacor-Toolkits-Documents/DQMH-Feature-Requests/tac-p/4047287/highlight/tr...
Yes, the DQMH 5.0 Validation tool adds the DQMH Module name which is redundant because the VI already has the Module Name inside of the code.
We added this as a placeholder for a much better feature that will come later: including in the error reporting where the error originated. We didn't get to that feature in time for DQMH 5.0 release. We discussed removing the validate/fixer but opted for leaving it there. When the new feature comes, we will use the module name as a guideline to where to make the replacement via scripting.
