DQMH Consortium Toolkits Feature Requests

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
joerg.hampel

Create xUnit style result for Headless Validation

Status: Declined

For the Validate Module\Validate DQMH Module (Headless).vi, consider formatting the Validation Results in xUnit format. 




DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshops (Fab, Steve, Brian and me)
Release Automation Tools for LabVIEW (CI/CD integration with LabVIEW)
HSE Discord Server (Discuss our free and commercial tools and services)
DQMH® (The Future of Team-Based LabVIEW Development)


3 Comments
joerg.hampel
Active Participant

After looking into the whole topic some more and discussing with other people, I do think that the DQMH Module Validation produces a code quality metric rather than a test metric.

 

Seeing as we use GitLab, I'd like to suggest for the validation tool to create reports in Code Climate syntax. See GitLab Code Quality - Implementing a custom tool for more details on that syntax.




DSH Pragmatic Software Development Workshops (Fab, Steve, Brian and me)
Release Automation Tools for LabVIEW (CI/CD integration with LabVIEW)
HSE Discord Server (Discuss our free and commercial tools and services)
DQMH® (The Future of Team-Based LabVIEW Development)


Olivier-JOURDAN
Active Participant

For the record. You can glance at it --> https://felipekb.com/2020/09/28/vi-analyzer-and-gitlab-code-quality/

 

That's an implementation of links shared by Joerg.


Olivier Jourdan

Wovalab founder | DQMH Consortium board member | LinkedIn |

Stop writing your LabVIEW code documentation, use Antidoc!
Olivier-JOURDAN
Active Participant
Status changed to: Declined
 

Olivier Jourdan

Wovalab founder | DQMH Consortium board member | LinkedIn |

Stop writing your LabVIEW code documentation, use Antidoc!