04-26-2018 04:21 AM
Running VI Analyzer is obviously strongly recommended before finishing the CLD exam. I understand that the graders will be referring to its results also when marking the exam. So how many of the failure types count towards the exam, and are there any details on which of them do?
Results such as:
There are definitely significant benefits to running the VI Analyzer, and it highlighed a few things that had escaped me when I tried it on a sample exam that I know I would be marked down for. I'm sure during the stress of the exam this will be a valuable resource. I was just wondering if anyone with insight here can say how many of the total results need to be addressed, in order to avoid losing points in the CLD marking process.
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-26-2018 08:05 AM
Hi Coral,
Personally I wouldn't mind the warnings in the VI analyzer too much for the CLD exam. Errors though...
On thing I would look after maybe and I think it is a warning, is the In Place Element structure. If the VI Analyzer spots it out, try to see if you can implement it.
Pieces of advice :
Hope that my point is clear. Feel free to ask if not.
04-26-2018 08:11 AM
Ok, so the VI Analyzer results are not strictly all relevant. It's up to the developer to know which ones to take into consideration for the CLD exam, basically. Thanks.
04-26-2018 08:19 AM
The only results that are strictly relevant for me are errors 😉