08-29-2013 11:17 PM - last edited on 09-20-2013 01:24 PM by JordanG
Is the test using LV 2012? Has it changed yet to 2013?
I have been using 2012 for the past year.
08-30-2013 06:33 AM - last edited on 09-20-2013 01:24 PM by JordanG
If you take the exam at an NI center, it will likely have 2013. But that shouldn't hurt you at all. Everything is still pretty much where it was before.
12-06-2013 08:18 AM - edited 12-06-2013 08:21 AM
Hi, I would like to mention a (small) coding mistake in the solution of CLD 11. When you open the solution and navigate to the Error Check of the producer you see this:
So after a diagram cleanup of this section it expands to this:
I don't know what the intention of the original programmer was but I guess he/she mend this:
Edit: a bit nore scrolling to the right (error handler) gave me this beauty:
12-06-2013 08:43 AM
@TimBotsM wrote:
Hi, I would like to mention a (small) coding mistake in the solution of CLD 11. When you open the solution and navigate to the Error Check of the producer you see this:
So after a diagram cleanup of this section it expands to this:
I don't know what the intention of the original programmer was but I guess he/she mend this:
Edit: a bit nore scrolling to the right (error handler) gave me this beauty:
That is actually a conversion from the old Merge Error function. If you look in the VI properties as soon as you open the VIs, you will see that they were written in LabVIEW 2009. The new(er) Merge Error that expands and is way faster was done in 2010.
12-06-2013 08:51 AM
@crossrulz wrote:
@TimBotsM wrote:
...
That is actually a conversion from the old Merge Error function. If you look in the VI properties as soon as you open the VIs, you will see that they were written in LabVIEW 2009. The new(er) Merge Error that expands and is way faster was done in 2010.
Ok that explains a lot since the error is twice in the VI and why they are alligned so nicely on the block diagram. It could be a idea to mention this in the "CLD success package users guide" so other users are aware of this.
However, next I'm wondering if the converter in LabVIEW shouldn't convert this to the 2012/2013 version instead of this strange edition.
12-09-2013 09:14 AM - edited 12-09-2013 09:15 AM
Your space bar may be broken.
@Cust_Cert_NI wrote:
Hi,
That is a result of down converting as mentioned. This occurs because we down copnvert theVI'sto , inthiscase, 2009. Asapolicyforconvenienceto ourcustomersweprovidematerialsonlineinaversionthatisthreeversionsbehind.
Or, maybe, your thumbs...
12-09-2013 09:42 AM
Hi, repost
That is a result of down converting as mentioned. This occurs because we down covert theVI's to , in this case, 2009. As a policy for convenience to our customers we provide materials online in a version that is three versions behind.
12-10-2013 09:11 AM
@jcarmody wrote:
Your space bar may be broken.
@Cust_Cert_NI wrote:
Hi,
That is a result of down converting as mentioned. This occurs because we down copnvert theVI'sto , inthiscase, 2009. Asapolicyforconvenienceto ourcustomersweprovidematerialsonlineinaversionthatisthreeversionsbehind.
Or, maybe, your thumbs...
(That's why I only use two fingers when typing)
12-12-2013 01:22 AM
Hi,
Just want to say that I found the Sucess Package a great help. I take the CLD exam in January, and having failed it last year found feel that I am in with a better chance having worked through the exercises.
Going to watch the videos next then try some of the sample exams.
Thanks Helen
12-12-2013 03:49 PM
Hi Helen,
Thank you for the feedback. We're glad you find it helpful!
Cheers,
Daniel