06-05-2012 11:49 AM
@TiTou wrote:
there is worse than locals... take a look at the VI attached in this post
Well, they didn't use any local variables.![]()
That reminds me of a crusade I had many years back. NI kept saying "locals are bad". So what did these C programmers using LabVIEW do? Use the value property node. And then they complained that LabVIEW was slow and they still had their race condition issues. What was even scarier is that people who came from other companies did the same thing. I took a prime opportunity to show them the error of their ways. But is was a stuggle to get it through some of their thick skulls.
06-05-2012 08:37 PM
@crossrulz wrote:
But is was a stuggle to get it through some of their thick skulls.
Perhaps use an indexed tunnel.
06-06-2012 07:24 AM
@Hornless.Rhino wrote:
@crossrulz wrote:
But is was a stuggle to get it through some of their thick skulls.Perhaps use an indexed tunnel.
I believe this is the code you are looking for
06-06-2012 08:46 AM
@JW-L3CE wrote:
@Hornless.Rhino wrote:
@crossrulz wrote:
But is was a stuggle to get it through some of their thick skulls.Perhaps use an indexed tunnel.
I believe this is the code you are looking for
Except they were trying to do this
Note: The Rube Goldberg code was on purpose
06-06-2012 08:48 AM - edited 06-06-2012 08:50 AM
TiTou a écrit :
there is worse than locals... take a look at the VI attached in this post
One important thing you can learn from this VI (screen capture from the code) :
doing it this way !
06-06-2012 02:41 PM
Here's another thread with the abuse of value property nodes.
06-07-2012 10:05 AM
I like Titou's comparison to a Belgian traffic/signal light. LOL!
06-07-2012 10:08 AM
@Ray.R wrote:
I like Titou's comparison to a Belgian traffic/signal light. LOL!
famous french joke... ![]()
We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.
Epictetus
06-08-2012 08:54 AM
@TiTou wrote:
@Ray.R wrote:
I like Titou's comparison to a Belgian traffic/signal light. LOL!
famous french joke...
For those of us that only speak Google Translate I hope someone can clairify this
"It is a Belgian flashing your system, once he walks, he suddenly does not work ..."
There seems to be something I am missing about Belgian flashers.
06-08-2012 09:05 AM
google's translation will never match human translation ![]()
Human translation would be :
"A Belgian indicator (we're talking about those little flashing lights on cars) only works half the time : works, doesn't work, works, doesn't work..."
We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.
Epictetus