WAY off topic, do horses have arms?

[Ray.R]

What about those crazy people who dress their dogs with Hawaiian shirts?  Does that mean those dogs with shirts have arms?

And what about humans who never wear shirts?

[altenbach]

---

Ray.R wrote:

And what about humans who never wear shirts?

---

Are you talking about me? 😄

[Ben]

---

Ray.R wrote:

What about those crazy people who dress their dogs with Hawaiian shirts?  Does that mean those dogs with shirts have arms?

And what about humans who never wear shirts?

---

Exactly!

Look at Pluto vs Goofy.

Re: "... what about humans who never wear shirts? "

If that statement applies to the dinner table then according to my Grandmother they are animals as well.

Ben

[Ray.R]

LOL!!

This could get naughty..  😉

[Ben]

---

Ray.R wrote:

LOL!!

This could get naughty..  😉

---

So now that you brought it up how do all of those Disey characters get away without wearing pants?

How can we knock kids for "slacking"* when we bring them watching cartoons that have slaked to the extreme and left their pants behind years ago?

Hmmmm?

Ben

* is that the right term?

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

Ben wrote:

So now that you brought it up how do all of those Disey characters get away without wearing pants?

---

A lack of pants means there is less restriction of movements around the legs, hips, and uh... other regions in that area. Due to this there is a wider range of leg motion available which is able to be exploited when calculating the leg torque used to provide motive force. Due to the lack of obstructions as seen by smooth bodies, there are also neat aerodynamic surfaces introduced. These can combine to provide an ability to run while getting away.

Either that of they have a driver waiting in a get away car.

[Ben]

---

Hornless.Rhino wrote:

...

Either that of they have a driver waiting in a get away car.

---

I always forget about the get away car.

 

Ben

[Ray.R]

Ben....

Our definition of "naughty" is obviously not the same...

Maybe having come back from lunch from a place with pretty waitresses skewed my minds / thought patterns..  😉

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

Ray.R wrote:

Ben....

Maybe having come back from lunch from a place with pretty waitresses skewed my minds / thought patterns..  😉

---

Which raises an interesting point.

What about sleeveless/legless attire.

Sleeveless tops don't have arm holes, legless bottoms (kilts, dresses, skirts, etc) don't have defined holes for each leg, they're more of a tube.

Does that mean someone wearing a kilt and naked on top has neither arms or legs while dressed like that.

[RavensFan]

I guess it depends on what they have on under the kilt.