le 09-21-2006 03:02 PM
Some more random thoughts....
After reading an article entitle "The Hamster Theory of RSX" the thought occured to me that laziness was a prime motivator for learning.
Stop and think about how much effort has gone into technology that lets us be lazier.
Eventually that left me believing that if I would ever develop artificial inteligence, it would require a machine with a "Maybe Gate" and was by its nature, lazy.
Next thought!
I have not liked these changes to LV over the years.
FIrst they decided to change my attribute nodes to property nodes. That was minor. 4.1 to 5.1)
THen they re-designed all of the icon and that forced me to re-learn what all of the functions looked like. (5.1 to 6.1)
Then they introduce these "I can read your mind functions" like auto-tool selection. This forced me to learn how to quickly shut them off! (6.1 to 7.1)
Then they go move all of my tools into a project thingy that I still have not learned to appreciate. ( 7.1 to 😎
But through all of these changes, I was forced to "adapt or die"!
Now attempt to connect the above:
I believe all of the b#tching that everyone is doing is because you all are lazy (i.e. intellegent) and can sense that you will have to adapt.
Done musing,
Ben
le 09-21-2006 05:12 PM
le 09-21-2006 05:40 PM
Ben wrote:
"I believe all of the b#tching that everyone is doing is because you all are lazy (i.e. intellegent) and can sense that you will have to adapt."
Sounds like us users just want to "Defer Decision" for now regarding changes in the IDE!![]()
-AK2DM
le 09-21-2006 06:43 PM
Well said AK2DM!
😄
le 09-21-2006 07:19 PM
personally, I think change is good and I have embraced most changes to the LabVIEW UI. For example, the new palette design is a definite improvement. I also love the auto tool!
LabVIEW is only 20, so it'll take another year before it is even allowed to buy alcohol here in the US. 😉 As with humans, this is a time for personality improvements and appearance changes.
If NI does things right, LabVIEW will gravitate to a more final and mature (and even better) form and the growing pains will be over at one point. 🙂
Looking back, many things computer related have changed to the better, even if these changes found resistance originally. Who would want to go back to 8.3 filenames? Commandline only UI? Singletasking OS?
le 09-22-2006 07:46 AM
Wow!
34 postings in two days.
We have been chatty haven't we?
Here is an update from support on that odd "Open LV 8.0" challenge I was facing.
"
I'm having trouble consistently reproducing this. I had one of my team mates reproduce the error and a second who seemed to be affected by the issue. But when we tested it on his computer it worked fine.
One team mates sees exactly what you see
When I close it out from 8.0, I right click on the vi and see 8.0 and 7.1 in the open with list. I do nothing.
Open and close 8.2
then go back tot the VI saved with 8.0 and now see 8.2 and 8.2 on the open with list.
My second team mate seemed to have seen it on his computer.
but in his list when we check was 8.0 and 7.1
when we go back and open 8.2 and then close
On the list is now 8.2 and 7.1 as you see. So this computer is almost the same but is somewhat understandable since 8.2 was opened.
"
I'll keep you all posted!
Ben
le 09-22-2006 08:49 AM
We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.
Epictetus
le 09-22-2006 01:57 PM
le 09-23-2006 09:41 AM
I just discovered that there are clones in LV8... 😮
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=206926
le 09-24-2006 09:36 AM
"... and the CAR ID is 41MGIPKZ "
The file association issue does not happen on all machines. The jury is still out on why this happens. Of course if we knew that we would half way to fixing it! ![]()
If I hear more I'll keep you posted.
Ben