BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Can I have one more, please?

I really like round numbers 😄

 

altenbach_0-1594922944638.png

 


LabVIEW Champion. It all comes together in GCentral GCentral
What does "Engineering Redefined" mean??
Message 1 of 13
(833 Views)

Mark is the winner!

 

(For some reason I sometimes don't get anything in the notification feed when something gets kudoed. I'll complain over in the feedback forum...)


LabVIEW Champion. It all comes together in GCentral GCentral
What does "Engineering Redefined" mean??
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 13
(828 Views)

I just gave you 1 just to mess it up 😈


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Message 3 of 13
(823 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

I just gave you 1 just to mess it up 😈


looked nice while it lasted... 😉 (few minutes)


LabVIEW Champion. It all comes together in GCentral GCentral
What does "Engineering Redefined" mean??
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 13
(820 Views)

Well your new goal should be 32,768 because that's a round number in binary.

Message 5 of 13
(763 Views)

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?

Message 6 of 13
(727 Views)

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄


LabVIEW Champion. It all comes together in GCentral GCentral
What does "Engineering Redefined" mean??
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 13
(699 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄


I think a few chads were hanging.

Message 8 of 13
(679 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄


I get 30007 when I view your profile in a new tab, 29845 when I watch in in the popup when hovering over your name. Guess it's a refresh problem.

 

Congrats!

 

The amount of kudos is impressive. The kudos/posts ratio is as well (3/4).

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 13
(640 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

I really like round numbers 😄

 

altenbach_0-1594922944638.png

 


Ah... another decimal basist! That is exactly 10 base 29999.

 

Thankfully base 4 (quadular) was never popular!  Could you imagine baseball players running around the infield in Grey's Code order?  Bonus! Imagine runners advancing on following hits or outs!  < it makes more sense than Cricket >

 

Enjoy the asylum!

"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 10 of 13
(304 Views)