BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Can I have one more, please?

I really like round numbers 😄

 

altenbach_0-1594922944638.png

 

Message 1 of 13
(9,639 Views)

Mark is the winner!

 

(For some reason I sometimes don't get anything in the notification feed when something gets kudoed. I'll complain over in the feedback forum...)

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 13
(9,634 Views)

I just gave you 1 just to mess it up 😈


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Message 3 of 13
(9,629 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

I just gave you 1 just to mess it up 😈


looked nice while it lasted... 😉 (few minutes)

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 13
(9,624 Views)

Well your new goal should be 32,768 because that's a round number in binary.

Message 5 of 13
(9,567 Views)

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?

Message 6 of 13
(9,531 Views)

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 13
(9,503 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄


I think a few chads were hanging.

Message 8 of 13
(9,483 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

He's at 'only' 29842 when I just checked...

 

That probably doesn't include some forums I don't have access to?


 

There are plenty of threads discussing inconsistencies in the counts, but I though that the real counts should but be globally correct. Hard to tell how it is actually coded.

 

Maybe your view is correct, but I am not doing or demanding a manual recount. 😄


I get 30007 when I view your profile in a new tab, 29845 when I watch in in the popup when hovering over your name. Guess it's a refresh problem.

 

Congrats!

 

The amount of kudos is impressive. The kudos/posts ratio is as well (3/4).

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 13
(9,444 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

I really like round numbers 😄

 

altenbach_0-1594922944638.png

 


Ah... another decimal basist! That is exactly 10 base 29999.

 

Thankfully base 4 (quadular) was never popular!  Could you imagine baseball players running around the infield in Grey's Code order?  Bonus! Imagine runners advancing on following hits or outs!  < it makes more sense than Cricket >

 

Enjoy the asylum!


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 10 of 13
(9,108 Views)